摘要
《伊本·马立克千联诗》(简称《诗》)和《伊本·阿齐勒〈千联诗〉注解》(简称《诗解》),是今天阿拉伯国家各高校最常用的语法教材之一,然而国内外鲜有研究专门讨论两者的差异。通过比较这两部著作发现:规则表述上,《诗解》容纳了更多可然性规则,并对规则的常用与少见提出了自身的看法,而《诗》所展现的语法规则更加严格。此外,注释者还否定了《诗》中的部分观点;语法分析上,对于《诗》中部分与格相关的规则或例句,注释者一方面指出相应的错误,另一方面对《诗》阐释不足的地方也作出了补充;用词上,注释者指出由于《诗》用词的含糊,一些规则条件没有得到充分说明,因此他修正了产生歧义的地方;最后,注释者还指出了《诗》中一些自相矛盾的表达。
Alfiyyah Ibn Mālik(or Alfiyyah)and Ibn Aqīl’s Commentary on it,are of the mostly chosen text books of Arabic Grammar in many Arabian universities today.However,few studies domestic or foreign,have discussed their differences.After comparing these two materials,it is concluded that in terms of rule expression,the Commentary contains more permitted rules,it holds its own views on the commonality and rareness of rules,while the rules expressed by the Alfiyyah are more restricted.Besides,Ibn Aqīl denied some of the views in the Alfiyyah.In terms of grammatical analysis,Ibn Aqīl pointed out the corresponding errors on the one hand for some of the rules or example sentences related to the case,and he supplemented the insufficient interpretation on the other hand.In terms of phrasing,Ibn Aqīl pointed out that due to the ambiguity of some words and expressions,the conditions of some rules were not fully explained,and he made his correction.At last,Ibn Aqīl also pointed out some contradictory expressions in the Alfiyyah.
出处
《阿拉伯研究论丛》
2021年第2期166-181,共16页
Arab Studies
基金
上海哲学社会科学规划一般课题“阿拉伯语教学语法术语的规范与统一”(课题批准号:2019BYY024)阶段性成果。