期刊文献+

Mini-CEX在中医儿科学临床教学中的应用与效果评价 被引量:13

Application and effect assessment of Mini-CEX in clinical teaching of pediatrics of Chinese medicine
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价迷你临床演练评估(mini-clinical exercise assessment,Mini-CEX)在中医儿科学临床教学中的应用效果,进一步优化具有中医儿科学特色的Mini-CEX量表,提高教师对其内涵的理解。方法选择儿科临床实习本科生50名,随机分为Mini-CEX组和对照组,每组各25人。总共实习4周。通过临床综合能力考核评价Mini-CEX应用效果;通过对Mini-CEX量表中各项内容的认可度、优势及存在问题进行问卷调查,以了解学生对临床教学中引入Mini-CEX的评价。采用SPSS 17.0软件进行t检验和卡方检验。结果 Mini-CEX组实习生临床综合能力考核总成绩及各分项成绩均高于对照组(P<0.05),同时对教学的满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。通过问卷发现,学生对改进后的Mini-CEX量表中项目的认可度较高,尤其是临床沟通技能、人文关怀这一类"软能力",认为其适合中医儿科的实习学习及效果评价。结论 Mini-CEX具有提升本科生临床综合能力、教学方法灵活、评价方式客观及注重医患沟通交流等技能培养的优势,值得在临床推广。 Objective To evaluate the application effect of mini-clinical exercise assessment (Mini-CEX) in clinical teaching of pediatrics of Chinese medicine, further optimize Mini-CEX scale with characteristics of pediatrics of Chinese medicine, and improve teachers' understanding of its connotation. Methods A total of 50 pediatric clinical practice undergraduates were randomly divided into Mini-CEX group and control group, 25 in each group, with a total of 4 weeks of practice. The application effect of Mini-CEX was evaluated by clinical comprehensive ability assessment, and the students' evaluation on the introduction of Mini-CEX in clinical teaching was understood through questionnaire survey on the recognition, advantages and existing problems of various contents of Mini-CEX. SPSS 17.0 was used for t test and chi-square test. Results Total scores and sub-item scores of clinical comprehensive ability examination in Mini-CEX group were higher than those in control group (P < 0.05), and the satisfaction with teaching in Mini-CEX group was significantly higher than that in control group (P < 0.05). Through the questionnaire, it was found that the students had a high degree of recognition for the items in the improved Mini-CEX scale, and thought it was more suitable for the internship study and effect evaluation of pediatrics of Chinese medicine, especially in the aspects of clinical communication skills and humanistic care. Conclusion Mini-CEX has many advantages, such as improving the clinical comprehensive ability of undergraduates, teaching effect, flexible teaching methods, objective evaluation methods and focusing on the cultivation of doctor-patient communication skills, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 陈自佳 韦尼 薛小娜 霍婧伟 郝宏文 吴力群 Chen Zijia;Wei Ni;Xue Xiaona;Huo Jingwei;Hao Hongwen;Wu Liqun(Teaching and Research Section of Pediatrics of Chinese Medicine,Second Clinical Medical College,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100078,China;Teaching and Research Section of Internal Medicine,Second Clinical Medical College,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100078,China)
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2021年第9期990-993,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基金 北京中医药大学教育科学研究专项课题(XJZX17080) 北京中医药大学东方医院"1166"人才工程——中青年专家(040204001001002003)。
关键词 迷你临床演练评估 中医儿科学 应用与效果评价 Mini-CEX Pediatrics of Chinese medicine Application and effect assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1李学谦,周喜汉.实习生临床技能培养的影响因素及对策[J].右江医学,2006,34(4):435-437. 被引量:8
  • 2刘声涛,戴海崎,周骏.新一代测验理论—认知诊断理论的源起与特征[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):73-77. 被引量:50
  • 3Norcini JJ,Blank LL,Duffy FD,et al.The mini-CEX:a method for assessing clinical skills.Ann Intern Med,2003,138:476-481.
  • 4Norcini JJ,Blank LL,Arnold GK,et al.The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise):a preliminary investigation.Ann Intern Med,1995,123:795-799.
  • 5Durning SJ,Cation LJ,Maskert RJ,et al.Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for internal medicine residency training.Acad Med,2002,77:900-904.
  • 6Holmboe ES,Huot S,Chung J,et al.Construct validity of the miniclinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX).Acad Med,2003,78:826-830.
  • 7Kogan JR,Holmboe ES,Hauer KE.Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees:a systematic review.JAMA,2009,302:1316-1326.
  • 8马道斯,斯塔弗尔比姆,斯克里文.方案的评价:历史的概观[G]//瞿葆奎,主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:77.
  • 9泰勒.怎样评价学习经验的效用[G]//瞿葆奎主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:263.
  • 10Scriven,M.The methodology of evaluation [G]//Tyler R.W.,Gagne,R.M.,Scriven,M.Perspectives of curriculum evaluation.Chicago:Rand McNally, 1967:39-83.

共引文献403

同被引文献141

引证文献13

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部