期刊文献+

合作问题解决能力测量:真实性与过程性评价视角 被引量:8

Measurement of Collaborative Problem-solving:From Perspective of Authenticity and Process Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合作问题解决能力是一种复杂的高阶技能,其有效测量面临困境。文章遵循真实性与过程性评价理念,尝试建构全新教育测验形式,探索合作问题解决能力有效测量的方法与过程。首先,基于真实性评价理念建构真实任务情境,开发具有真实性、交互性、动态性的测验任务。其次,获取学生在测验任务中的过程性表现,从过程数据中提取有意义的行为模式作为观测指标,以此形成合作问题解决能力的测量证据。再次,鉴于“两人交互”的合作形式和三种观测指标并存的项目结构,应用两维度Rasch模型进行测验分析和估计学生能力。模型拟合结果显示测验项目的MNSQ值处于0.87~1.34之间,项目的整体分离度为0.981,大部分项目的区分度大于0.3,学生能力分布符合一般实际,表明测量模型拟合较好,测验项目质量较高。研究结果说明基于真实任务与过程性测验表现测量合作问题解决能力是一种可行的途径,这种新测验形式对复杂技能的有效测量具有重要借鉴意义。 Collaborative problem-solving is a complex higher-order skill,and its effective measurement is faced with difficulties.Following the concept of authenticity and process assessment,this paper tries to construct a new form of educational test,and explores an effective method and process for the measurement of collaborative problem-solving.Firstly,based on the concept of authentic assessment,authentic task situations are constructed,and test tasks featured authenticity,interaction and dynamics are developed.Secondly,the process performance of students in the test tasks is obtained,and meaningful behavior patterns are extracted from the process data as observation indexes to form the evidence for the measurement of collaborative problem-solving.Thirdly,a two-dimensional Rasch model is used to analyze the test and estimate students'abilities in view of the collaborative form of"two-person interaction"and the project structure with the coexistence of three kinds of observation indicators.The model fit results shows that the MNSQ value of the test items range from 0.87 to 1.34,the overall separation degree of the items is 0.981,and the discrimination of most items is greater than 0.3.The distribution of students'abilities is in line with the general condition,indicating a good fit of the measurement model and a high quality of the test items.The results shows that it is a feasible way to measure collaborative problem-solving based on authentic tasks and procedural test performance,and this new test form could benefit the effective measurement of complex skills.
作者 袁建林 刘红云 YUAN Jianlin;LIU Hongyun(Educational Science Research Institute,Hunan University,Changsha Hunan 410082;Faculty of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
出处 《电化教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期100-108,共9页 E-education Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究2019年度青年基金项目“基于过程数据的核心素养测量研究——以合作问题解决能力为例”(项目编号:19YJC880123)。
关键词 合作问题解决能力 测量 真实性评价 过程性评价 Collaborative Problem-solving Measurement Authentic Assessment Process Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献83

  • 1张向众,李永珺.真实性评价和课堂教学的整合[J].外国教育研究,2004,31(8):42-46. 被引量:20
  • 2钟志贤.教学设计的宗旨:促进学习者高阶能力发展[J].电化教育研究,2004,25(11):13-19. 被引量:224
  • 3俎媛媛.美国真实性学生评价及其启示[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(03B):62-66. 被引量:37
  • 4Biggs & Telfer. The process of learning (2nd edition)[M]. Prentice-Hall of Australia, 1987.
  • 5J. Biggs. Testing: To Educate or to Select?[M]. Hong Kong Educational Publishing Co., 1996.
  • 6J. Alderson & D. Wall. Does washback exist?[J]. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), p.115-129, 1993.
  • 7原文为''evaluate, to determine or set the value or amount of'',摘自:《Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary Of The English Language》, Gramercy Books;1989, p.493.
  • 8Archbald, D. A. Authentic assessment: principles, practices and issues[J]. School Psychology Quar- terly, 1991,6(4) :279 - 293.
  • 9Elliot, S. N. Authentic assessment: An introduction to a neobehavioral approach to class-room assessment [ J ]. School Psychology Quarterly, 1991,6 (4) : 273 - 278.
  • 10Darling - Hammond, L & Wentworth, L. Benchmarking learning systems : Student performance as- sessment in international context [ M ]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, 2010.

共引文献746

同被引文献60

引证文献8

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部