期刊文献+

“平等主义”与“性别主义”——简议美国女性主义史学的两条思路 被引量:2

“Egalitarianism” and “Maternalism”: A Brief Discussion on Two Ideas of American Feminist Historiography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国女性主义史学至少包含两条不同的思路——“平等主义”与“性别主义”。“平等主义”起源于启蒙人权观念。借助启蒙人权观念,美国女权主义者自19世纪末20世纪初第一波女权运动浪潮以来,便开始呼吁男女平等。但在现实斗争中,男女平等的诉求遭遇了较大的阻力,女权运动进展有限。女权主义者不得不将思路转向“性别主义”。“性别主义”强调女性为人妻母的传统角色,并以此名义涉足公共领域,突破了“分离领域”的界限。如此一来,“性别主义”便从早期的权宜之策转变为一种越来越成熟的女权主义思路。上述两条思路从现实逐渐延伸到史学研究之中,催生了关注性别不平等和关注女性力量两个类别的女性主义历史书写。 American feminist thought contains at least two different lines: “egalitarianism” and “maternalism”.“Egalitarianism” originated from the concept of enlightenment human rights.Borrowed from the enlightenment concept of human rights, American feminists have been calling for equality between men and women since the first wave of feminist movements at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century.However, in the struggle of the real world, the demand for equality between men and women has encountered excessive resistance, and the feminist movement has made limited progress.They had to change their strategy from “egalitarianism” to “maternalism”.“Maternalism” emphasizes the traditional role of women as wives and mothers, who sets foot in the public sphere in this name, breaking through the boundaries of “separate spheres”.In this way, “maternalism” has changed from an early expedient to an increasingly mature feminist thinking.These two lines of feminism gradually extended from the feminist practices to the historical writing, giving birth to two different ways of feminist historical writing: One focuses on gender inequality, and the other focuses on women’s power.
作者 林漫 LIN Man(School of History,Culture and Tourism,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin,Guangxt,541004,China)
出处 《史学集刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期28-39,共12页 Collected Papers of History Studies
关键词 性别 妇女史 美国 性别主义 平等主义 gender women’s history America egalitarianism maternalism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献9

  • 1王雪萍.《闺塾师》与中国妇女史研究的方法论[J].妇女研究论丛,2006(6):38-42. 被引量:4
  • 2Richard. Hofstadter:《The Progressive Movement1900 - 1915》 New York 1963年版, P84 - 87, P84 - 87.
  • 3《现代美国》.[美]德怀特·L·杜德蒙著,商务印书馆1984年版,P62.
  • 4《The American Historical Review》 1984年第三期之 Paula·baker:《(The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society 1780- 1920》,P632.
  • 5Barbara Welter.《The Women Questions inAmerican History》 New York 1973年版, P85 - 86, P84,P81.
  • 6[美]吉达·勒纳著.《妇女史的挑战》[J].世界史研究动态,1991,:42-42.
  • 7《美国读本》.[美]戴安娜·拉维奇,林本椿等译,三联书店1995年,P581-582.
  • 8Harold. V. Fatlkner:《The Quest for Social Justice1898- 1914》 The Maemillam Company 1931 年版 P163.
  • 9《Clio Was a Woman: Studies in the History of American Women》 edited by Mabel. E. Deutrich and Virginia. C. Purdy Howard University press Washington D C 1980年版 P142.

共引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部