期刊文献+

The~1.4 GaA-type granitoids in the“Chottanagpur crustal block”(India),and its relocation from Columbia to Rodinia?

下载PDF
导出
摘要 In paleogeographic reconstructions of the Columbia and Rodinia Supercontinents,the position of the Greater India landmass is ambiguous.This,coupled with a limited understanding of the tectonic evolution of the mobile belts along which the mosaic of crustal domains in India accreted,impedes precise correlation among the dispersed crustal fragments in supercontinent reconstructions.Using structural,metamorphic phase equilibria,chronological and geochemical investigations,this study aims to reconstruct the tectonic evolution of the Chottanagpur Gneiss Complex(CGC)as a distinct crustal block at the eastern end of the Greater Indian Proterozoic Fold Belt(GIPFOB)along which the North India Block(NIB)and the South India Block(SIB)accreted.The study focuses on two issues,e.g.dating the Early Neoproterozoic(0.92 Ga)accretion of the CGC with the NIB contemporaneous with the assembly of Rodinia,and documenting the widespread(>24,000 km^(2))plutonism of1.5-1.4 Ga weakly peraluminous,calc-alkalic to alkali-calcic and ferroan A-type granitoids(±garnet)devoid of mafic microgrannular enclaves and coeval mafic emplacements in the crustal block.These dominantly within-plate granitoids arguably formed by asthenospheric upwelling induced partial melting of garnetbearing anatectic quartzofeldspathic gneisses that dominate the Early Mesoproterozoic basement of the block.The major and trace element chemistry of the granitoids is similar to the 1.35-1.45 Ga A-type granitoids in Laurentia/Amazonia emplaced contemporaneous with the 1.5-1.3 Ga breakup of the Columbia Supercontinent.This study suggests the Chottanagpur Gneiss Complex occured as a fragmented crustal block following the breakup of the Columbia Supercontinent;the crustal block was subsequently integrated within India during the Early Neoproterozoic oblique accretion between the NIB and SIB contemporaneous with the Rodinia Supercontinent assembly.
出处 《Geoscience Frontiers》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2022年第2期405-429,共25页 地学前缘(英文版)
基金 the financial support provided by UGC(India)fellowship the financial support for fieldwork provided through the CPDA funding scheme by Indian Institute of Technology,Kharagpur Invaluable support by Atreyee Bhattacharya(INSTAAR,Boulder)via internal educational initiative grants at University of Colorado Boulder for the SIMS geochronology work at UCLA is greatly appreciated The UCLA Ion Microprobe Laboratory is partially supported by a grant from NSF-EAR’s Instrumentation and Facilities Program(1734856)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献48

  • 1Amarasinghe, U., Chaudhuri, A., Collins, A.S., Deb, G., Patranabis-Deb, S., 2015. Evolving provenance in the Proterozoic Pranhita-Godavari Basin, India. Geoscience Frontiers 6, 453-463. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.03.009.
  • 2Amato, J.M., Mack, G.H., 2012. Detrital zircon geochronology from the Cambrian-Ordovician Bliss Sandstone, New Mexico: evidence for contrasting Grenville-age and Cambrian sources on opposite sides of the Transcontinental Arch. Geological Society of America Bulletin 124, 1826-1840. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1130/B30657.1.
  • 3Bickford, M., Chase, R., Nelson, B., 1981. U-Pb studies of zircon cores and overgrowths, and monazite: implications for age and petrogenesis of the northeastern Idaho batholith. The Journal of Geology 89 (4), 433-457.
  • 4Boehnke, P., Harrison, T.M., 2014. A meta-analysis of geochronologically relevant half-lives: what’s the best decay constant? International Geology Review 56, 905-914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2014.908420.
  • 5Botev, Z.I., Grotowski, J.F., Kroese, D.P., 2010. Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Annals of Statistics 38, 2916-2957.
  • 6Cherniak, D.J., Watson, E.B., 2000. Pb diffusion in zircon. Chemical Geology 172, 5-24.
  • 7Condon, D.J., Bowring, S.A., 2011. Chapter 9 a user’s guide to Neoproterozoic geochronology. Geological Society, London, Memoirs 36, 135-149. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1144/M36.9.
  • 8Corfu, F., 2013. A century of U-Pb geochronology: the long quest towards concordance. Geological Society of America Bulletin 125, 33-47. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1130/B30698.1.
  • 9Coleman, D.S., Gray, W., Glazner, A.F., 2004. Rethinking the emplacement and evolution of zoned plutons: geochronologic evidence for incremental assembly of the Tuolumne Intrusive Suite, California. Geology 32, 433. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1130/G20220.1.
  • 10Dehler, C.M., Fanning, C.M., Link, P.K., Kingsbury, E.M., Rybczynski, D., 2010. Maximum depositional age and provenance of the Uinta mountain group and big cottonwood formation, northern Utah. Paleogeography of Rifting Western Laurentia: Geological Society of America Bulletin 122 (9-10), 1686-1699. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1130/B30094.1.

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部