期刊文献+

景区图像的匹配效应对游客目的地选择意向的影响研究——基于心理模拟的中介作用 被引量:1

The Impact of Scenic Spot Images Matching Effects on Tourists’Destination Choice Intention from the Perspective of the Mediating Role of Psychological Simulations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以游客在线制订旅游攻略为研究场景,结合心理模拟理论的解释机制,构建景区类型与图像类型匹配对游客目的地选择意向影响的理论假设模型。通过心理学实验研究方法获取225位被试实证数据,运用方差分析和回归分析方法检验研究假设。结果显示,景区类型与图像类型的匹配将显著影响游客目的地选择意向,心理模拟起到中介作用。具体而言,对于功能型景区,实拍的景区图像将提高游客对该景区的选择意向;对于享乐型景区,非实拍图像更能提高游客的选择意向。建议根据景区类型差异,展示不同风格的宣传图像,以达到最佳宣传效果。 Taking tourists to formulate travel strategies online as a research scenario,combined with the interpretation mechanism of psychological simulation theory,a research model on the influence of the matching of scenic spot types and image types on tourists’destination choice intentions is constructed.This article obtained empirical data from 225 subjects through psychological experimental research methods,and used analysis of variance and regression analysis to test research hypotheses.The results show that the matching of scenic spot type and image type will significantly affect tourists’destination choice intention,and psychological simulation plays an intermediary role.Specifically,for the functional scenic spot,real scenic images will improve tourists’intention to choose the scenic spot;for the hedonic scenic spot,non-real images can improve tourists’intention.It is recommended to display different types of publicity images according to the differences in scenic spots,in order to achieve the best publicity effect.
作者 李佩镅 陈松 周诗敏 Li Peimei;Chen Song;Zhou Shimin(School of International Tourism,Hainan College of Economics and Business,Haikou 571127,China)
出处 《无锡商业职业技术学院学报》 2022年第2期59-65,共7页 Journal of Wuxi Vocational Institute of Commerce
基金 海南经贸职业技术学院校级课题“基于感官营销视角下海南旅游目的地形象建设的应用研究”(hnjmk2020414) 海南省高等学校科学研究项目“旅游扶贫视域下海南黎族苗族特色资源整合模式与路径选择”(Hnky2021-67) 海南省自然科学基金项目“大数据视角下游客感官体验感知差异的心理机制研究”(720RC668)。
关键词 景区图像 景区类型 目的地选择意向 心理模拟 scenic spot images scenic spot types destination choice intention psychological simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1陈俊,贺晓玲,张积家.反事实思维两大理论:范例说和目标-指向说[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):416-422. 被引量:31
  • 2Taylor, S. E. , Schneider, S.K. Coping and the simulation of e- vents. Social Cognition, 1989, 7(2) , 174 - 194.
  • 3Markman, K.D. , Kray, L J. & Galinsky, A.D. Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical prob- lem solving. The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 33(3), 312 -324.
  • 4Sanna, L.J. , Turley, K.J. Antecedents to spontaneous eounterfac- tual thinking: effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1996, 22 ( 9 ) , 906 -919.
  • 5Markman, K. D. , McMullen, M.N. A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2003, 3, 244- 267.
  • 6Pham, L. B. & Taylor, S.E. From thought to action: effects of process- versus outcome -based mental simulations on perform- ance. The society for personality and social psychology, 1999, 25 (2), 250-260.
  • 7Sanna, L.J. ,Carter, S.E. & Burkley, E. Yesterday,today, and tomorrow : Counterfactual thinking and beyond. In A. J. Strathman&J. A. Jolreman ( Eds. ) , Understanding behavior in the context of time : Theory, research, and application. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum,2005, 165 - 185.
  • 8Ray, R. D. , Ochsner, K.N. Individual differences in trait rumina- tion and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal. Cogni- tive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2005, 5 (2), 156 - 168.
  • 9Par.ks, C.D. , Sanna, L. J, Posey, D.C. Retrospection in social dilemmas: how thinking about the past affects future cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 84(5 ), 988 - 996.
  • 10Kray, L.J. & Galinsky, A.D. The debiasing effect of counterfac- tual mind - sets : Increasing the search for disconfirmatory informa- tion in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci- sion Processes, 2003, 91, 69- 81.

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部