期刊文献+

大学生网络欺凌调查表中文版的信度与效度分析 被引量:2

Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of cyberbullying inventory for college students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对大学生网络欺凌调查表(cyberbullying inventory for college students,CICS)进行汉化,检验其在中国文化背景下的信度和效度并进行初步应用。方法采用大学生网络欺凌调查表中文版(Chinese version of cyberbullying inventory for college students,CICS-CV),对1 528位大学生进行调查,6个月后,对其中208名大学生进行重测。状态-特质愤怒表达量表-2的特质愤怒分量表和Buss-Perry攻击量表作为网络欺凌的效标,抑郁-焦虑-压力量表作为网络被欺凌的效标,进行效标效度检验。使用SPSS 24.0进行项目分析、探索性因子分析、信度检验、效标效度检验和交叉滞后分析,采用Mplus 8.3进行验证性因子分析。结果探索性因素分析得出网络欺凌和网络被欺凌两个因子,因子载荷分别为0.59~0.82,0.59~0.80。验证性因素分析表明,两因子模型的拟合达到测量学要求(χ^(2)/df=2.61,CFI=0.90,TLI=0.89,RMSEA=0.04,SRMR=0.05)。该量表的内部一致性系数分别为0.88、0.89,重测信度为0.97。网络欺凌、网络被欺凌与各效标问卷之间均呈显著正相关(r=0.23~0.42,均P<0.05)。道德推脱与网络欺凌的交叉滞后分析表明,第一次测量的道德推脱可显著预测第二次测量的网络欺凌(β=0.16,t=2.16,P<0.05)。结论 CICS-CV具有良好的信度和效度,试用效果良好,可以作为我国大学生网络欺凌的有效测评工具。 Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of cyberbullying inventory for college students(CICS-CV)in the context of Chinese culture and make preliminary application.Methods A total of 1528 college students completed the CICS-CV,and 208 students completed CICS-CV after six months.Trait anger subscale of state-trait anger expression inventory-2,and Buss-Perry aggressive qusetionnaire were used as the criterion of cyberbullying aggression,and depression anxiety stress scales were used as the criterion for cyberbullying victimization to test its validity.Item analysis,exploratory factor analysis,reliability test,calibration validity test and corss-lag analysis were conducted by SPSS 24.0 software,and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted by Mplus 8.3.Results The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that two factors were obtained named as cyberbullying aggression and cyberbullying victimization,and the factor loadings were 0.59-0.82,0.59-0.80.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting index of the double factor model was fitting well(χ^(2)/df=2.61,CFI=0.90,TLI=0.89,RMSEA=0.04,SRMR=0.05).The internal consistency coefficient of the two subscales were 0.88,0.89,and test-retest reliability were both 0.97.There was a significant positive correlation between cyberbullying aggression(victimization)and the criterions(r=0.23-0.42,all P<0.05).Cross-lag analysis of moral disengagement and cyberbullying aggression showed that the first measurement of moral disengagement significantly predicted the second measurement of cyberbullying aggression(β=0.16,t=2.16,P<0.05).Conclusion The CICS-CV has good reliability and validity,which can be used as an effective tool for evaluating college students'cyberbullying in China.
作者 唐丽丽 夏凌翔 杜欣蔚 赵永萍 Tang Lili;Xia Lingxiang;Du Xinwei;Zhao Yongping(Faulty of Psychology,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第3期267-272,共6页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家社会科学基金西部项目(20XSH025)。
关键词 网络欺凌 大学生 信度 效度 Cyberbullying College students Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献67

  • 1张文新,武建芬.Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订[J].心理发展与教育,1999,15(2):8-12. 被引量:231
  • 2Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral iden- tity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (6), 1423 - 1440.
  • 3Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement, in W. Reich (ed.) , Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetuation of inhu- manities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3 (3), 193 - 209.
  • 5Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31 (2), 101 - 119.
  • 6Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of mor- al agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 ( 2 ) , 364 - 374.
  • 7Barsky, A. J., Islam, G., & Zyphur, M. J. (2006). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Ibmec Working Paper, wpe - 14.
  • 8Boardley, I. D., & Kavussanu, M. (2007). Development and valida- tion of the moral disengagement in sport seale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(5 ), 608 -628.
  • 9Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (3), 452 - 459.
  • 10Captain, G. V., Fida, R., Veeehione, M., Tramontano, C., & Bar- baranelli, C. (2009). Assessing civic moral disengagement: Di- mensionality and construct validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5 ) , 504 - 509.

共引文献86

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部