期刊文献+

减瘤手术联合靶向治疗在转移性肾癌合并下腔静脉癌栓治疗中的临床价值 被引量:2

Clinical value of cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨减瘤手术联合靶向治疗转移性肾癌(metastatic renal cell carcinoma,mRCC)合并下腔静脉癌栓患者的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2011年11月至2019年02月收治的13例mRCC合并下腔静脉癌栓患者的临床资料,根据有无靶向治疗分为靶向组和非靶向组。靶向组8例,男7例,女1例,平均年龄(48.38±13.92)岁,肿瘤位于左侧5例,右侧3例,平均直径(9.93±5.37)cm。非靶向组5例,男4例,女1例,平均年龄(60.60±5.37)岁,肿瘤位于左侧1例,右侧4例,平均直径(11.24±2.76)cm。结果:术后病理:靶向组透明细胞癌6例,乳头状肾细胞癌和肉瘤样癌各1例,术后TNM分期T_(3b)N_(1)M_(0)和T_(4)N_(1)M_(1)各1例,T_(3a)N_(1)M_(1)3例,T_(3b)N_(1)M_(1)3例。非靶向组透明细胞癌2例,Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌、乳头状肾细胞癌和低分化癌各1例,术后TNM分期T_(3b)N_(1)M_(1)和T_(3c)N_(1)M_(1)各1例,T_(4)N_(1)M_(1)3例。所有患者获随访4~47个月,中位随访时间27个月。靶向组和非靶向组中位无进展生存期分别为6.5个月和2个月,半年、1年无进展生存率分别为50.00%(4/8)、37.50%(3/8)和40.00%(2/5)、20.00%(1/5),两组对比无统计学差异(HR=0.46,95%CI:0.13~1.70,P=0.1259)。靶向组和非靶向组中位总生存期分别为41个月和8个月,1年和2年总存活率分别为100.00%(8/8)、87.50%(7/8)和20.00%(1/5)、20.00%(1/5),两组对比统计学差异显著(HR=0.17,95%CI:0.03~0.99,P=0.0005)。结论:减瘤手术治疗mRCC并下腔静脉癌栓患者安全有效,术后进行靶向治疗可显著延长患者总生存期。 Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma(mRCC)with inferior vena cava(IVC)tumor thrombus.Methods:The clinical data of 13 mRCC patients with IVC tumor thrombus from November 2011 to February 2019 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively.In the target group,there were 8 cases,7 males and 1 female,with an average age of(48.38±13.92)years old.Five tumors were on the left side and three tumors were on the right side,with an average diameter of(9.93±5.37)cm.In the non-targeted group,there were 5 cases,4 males and 1 female,with an average age of(60.60±5.37)years old.The tumor was located in 1 case on the left and 4 cases on the right,with an average diameter of(11.24±2.76)cm.Results:Postoperative pathology:In the targeted group,there were 6 cases of clear cell carcinoma,1 case of papillary renal cell carcinoma and 1 case of sarcomatoid carcinoma,1 case of T_(3b)N_(1)M_(0) and T_(4)N_(1)M_(1) respectively,3 cases of T_(3a)N_(1)M_(1) and T_(3b) N_(1)M_(1 )respectively.In the non-targeted group,there were 2 cases of clear cell carcinoma,1 case of Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion related renal carcinoma,papillary renal cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma respectively,1 case of T_(3b)N_(1)M_(1) and T_(3c) N_(1)M_(1) respectively,and 3 cases of T_(4)N_(1)M_(1).All patients were followed up for 4~47 months,with a median follow-up of 27 months.The median progression free survival(PFS)time was 6.5 months and 2 months in the target group and non-target group,and the half-year and one-year PFS rates were 50.00%(4/8),37.50%(3/8)and 40.00%(2/5),20.00%(1/5),respectively.There was no significant difference between the two groups(HR=0.46,95%CI:0.13~1.70,P=0.1259).The median overall survival(OS)time of the target group and the non-target group was 41 months and 8 months respectively,and the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 100.00%(8/8),87.50%(7/8)and 20.00%(1/5),20.00%(1/5),respectively.The difference was statistically significant(HR=0.17,95%CI:0.03~0.99,P=0.0005).Conclusion:Cytoreductive nephrectomy is safe and effective for mRCC patients with IVC tumor thrombus.Targeted therapy can significantly prolong the overall survival of patients.
作者 井高鹏 田向永 曹广辉 武小强 吴轩 王志为 张缠 闫天中 JING Gaopeng;TIAN Xiangyong;CAO Guanghui;WU Xiaoqiang;WU Xuan;WANG Zhiwei;ZHANG Chan;YAN Tianzhong(Department of Urology,Henan University People's Hospital,Henan Zhengzhou 450003,China;Department of Urology,Henan Province People's Hospital,Henan Zhengzhou 450003,China.)
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第9期1613-1616,共4页 Journal of Modern Oncology
基金 河南省科技攻关项目(编号:202102310438) 河南省人民医院“23456人才工程”(编号:ZC23456127)。
关键词 转移性肾癌 下腔静脉癌栓 减瘤手术 metastatic renal cell carcinoma inferior vena cava tumor thrombus cytoreductive nephrectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, et al. The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus [J]. BJU Int,201M,94: 33-41.
  • 2Shueh B, Laroehelle JC, Onyia T, et al. Intraoperative thrombus embolization during nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy : Critical analysis of the University of California-Los Angeles experienee[J]. J Urol,2009,181 : 492-498.
  • 3MeDougall E, Clayman RV, Elashry OM. Laparoseopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience[J]. J Uro1,1996,155: 1180-1185.
  • 4Wang W, Wang L, Xu J, et al. Pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for right renal masses with renal vein and inferior vena cava thrombus[ J]. J Endourol,2014,28: 819-824.
  • 5Romero FR, Muntener M, Bagga HS, et al. Pure laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with level II vena caval thrombectomy [ J ]. Urology,2006,68 : 1112-1114.
  • 6Kovac JR, Luke PP. Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the treatment of a renal cell carcinoma with a level II vena cava thrombus[ J ]. Int Braz J Urol,2010,36 : 327-331.
  • 7Liss MA, Park SK, Kopp RP, et al. Is laparoendoscopic single-site surgery a viable approach for radical nephrectomy with renal vein thrombus? Comparison with muhiport laparoscopy [ J]. Urology, 2013,82 : 105-110.
  • 8Bansal RK, Tu HY, Drachenberg D, et al. Laparoscopic management of advanced renal cell carcinoma with renal vein and inferior vena eava thrombus[ J]. Urology,2014,83 : 812-816.
  • 9Fan X, Xu K, Lin T, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis [ J ]. BJU Int, 2013,111 : 6114521.
  • 10Hoang AN, Vaporcyian AA, Matin SF. Laparoscopy-assisted radical nephrectomy with inferior vena caval thrombectomy for level Ⅱ to Ⅲ tumor thrombus: a single-insitution experience and review of the literature[ J]. J Endourol,2010,24 : 1005-1112.

共引文献14

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部