期刊文献+

基于三方博弈模型的电商平台合谋监管制度设计 被引量:1

Design of Collusion Supervision System of E-Commerce Platform Based on Tripartite Game Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在B2C电子商务平台中,商家与消费者之间存在的信息不对称问题日趋严重。商家利用双方信息不对称,采取以假乱真、虚标价格等欺诈投机行为,达到竞争中取胜的目的。并且,目前B2C电子商务平台对商家的不良行为未建立有效的监管机制。鉴于此,运用三方博弈模型,对商家、电子商务平台与政府的行为进行分析,发现对合谋行为加大观测力度和惩罚力度是消除电子商务平台与商家合谋行为的关键,可借助制度工程学的关键理论——孙氏图,对B2C电子商务平台的监管制度给出设计建议。 In B2C E-commerce platform,the problem of information asymmetry is becoming more and more serious between merchants and consumers.Merchants take advantage of information symmetry between the two sides to achieve the goal of winning in the competition by fraudulent and speculative behaviors such as false and false prices.In addition,the current B2C E-commerce platform has not established an effective supervision mechanism for the bad behaviors of merchants.Based on the complete information tripartite static game model,through the behavior analysis among the government,E-commerce platform and business in the B2C E-commerce platform supervision,it is found that the key to restrain collusion is to strengthen the observation and punishment of collusion.Therefore,according to the theory and method of system engineering,puts forward some improvement suggestions for the loopholes of the existing E-commerce platform supervision system,so as to create a safe and healthy online shopping environment.
作者 张文浩 张峥 ZHANG Wen-hao;ZHANG Zheng(University of Shanghai for Science and Technology School of Management,Shanghai 200093,China)
出处 《经济研究导刊》 2022年第12期153-155,共3页 Economic Research Guide
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71371124)。
关键词 B2C电商平台 三方博弈 制度工程学 监管制度 B2C E-commerce platform tripartite game system engineering supervisory system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1张娥,杨飞,汪应洛.网上交易中诚信交易激励机制设计[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(1):64-70. 被引量:28
  • 2井淼,周颖,王方华.网上购物感知风险的实证研究[J].系统管理学报,2007,16(2):164-169. 被引量:41
  • 3Ba S, Pavtou P A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior[J].MIS Quarterly, 2002, 26(3): 243-268.
  • 4Dellarocas C. Goodwill hunting: An economically efficient online feedback mechanism for environments with variable product quality [C] // International Workshop on Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce,Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002: 238-252.
  • 5Wood C, Dellarocas C. The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the reporting bias[J].Management Science, 2008, 54 (3): 460- 476.
  • 6Li L F. Reputation, trust, and rebates: How online auction markets can improve their feedback mechanisms[J]. Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 2010, 19(2) :303-331.
  • 7Zhao H, Yang X, Li X. An incentive mechanism to reinforce truthful reports in reputation systems [J].Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2012, 35(3):951-961.
  • 8Ghaffarinejad A, Akhari M K. An incentive compatible and distributed reputation mechanism based on context similarity for service oriented systems[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2013, 29(3) :863-875.
  • 9Ba S. Establishing online trust through a community responsibility system[J].Decision Support Systems, 2001, 31(3): 323-336.
  • 10Hu X, Lin Z, Whinston A B, et al. Hope or hype:On the viability of escrow services as trusted third parties in online auction environments[J]. Information Systems Research, 2004, 15(3): 236- 249.

共引文献11

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部