期刊文献+

深度学习算法在胰腺低剂量CT扫描中改善图像质量的应用价值 被引量:11

The application value of deep learning reconstruction algorithm in improving quality of low dose pancreatic CT images
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探究深度学习算法(DLR)在胰腺低剂量CT扫描中改善图像质量的价值。方法前瞻性收集2020年8月至12月在北京协和医院进行腹部胰腺增强检查的68例患者,采用随机区组法分为正常剂量组和低剂量组,各34例,正常剂量组扫描管电压为120 kV,低剂量组管电压为100 kV。所有患者均行平扫、动脉期、实质期、延迟期扫描。低剂量组4期图像分别采用滤波反投影(FBP)、混合模型迭代算法(AIDR)和DLR 3种方法重建图像,正常剂量组4期图像均采用AIDR重建图像,分别记为LD-FBP、LD-AIDR、LD-DLR、RD-AIDR。测量胰腺的CT值、噪声值(SD),计算信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR),不同重建方法图像间各参数的比较采用单因素方差分析,两两比较采用LSD法;对每组图像进行主观评分,多组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果正常剂量组和低剂量组患者胰腺平扫、动脉期、实质期、延迟期不同重建方法图像间胰腺CT值、SD、SNR、CNR差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。实质期和延迟期图像LD-FBP、LD-AIDR、LD-DLR图像CT值均高于RD-AIDR图像(P均<0.05);4期图像间SD、SNR两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);4期LD-FBP、LD-DLR与RD-AIDR的CNR差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),RD-AIDR的CNR优于LD-FBP,LD-DLR优于RD-AIDR。DLR算法对胰腺4期图像的SD、SNR、CNR均有改善,其中对SNR的改善增强图像更为显著,对CNR的改善平扫期和延迟期更为显著。胰腺4期不同算法重建图像主观评分差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。LD-DLR与RD-AIDR评分差异无统计学意义(平扫、动脉期、实质期、延迟期Z值分别为1.00、2.24、0.45、1.34,P值分别为0.317、0.025、0.655、0.180)。结论DLR技术可以在降低胰腺CT辐射剂量的同时改善图像质量,满足诊断需求,在胰腺低剂量增强CT检查中可降低噪声,提高图像的信号SNR和CNR。 Objective To explore application value of improving quality of the low dose pancreatic CT images by using deep learning reconstruction(DLR).Methods From August to December 2020,68 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced pancreatic CT were prospectively collected in Peking Union Medical College Hospital.All patients were randomly divided into routine dose group(34 patients,with tube voltage of 120 kV)and low dose group(34 patients,with tube voltage of 100 kV).All patients underwent non-contrast,arterial phase,parenchymal phase and delay phase scans.The four-phase images of low dose group were reconstructed by using filtered back projection(FBP),hybrid iterative reconstruction(AIDR)and DLR which were marked with LD-FBP,LD-AIDR and LD-DLR,respectively.The four-phase images of routine dose group were reconstructed by using AIDR algorithm which were marked with RD-AIDR.The CT value,image noise(SD),signal to noise ratio(SNR)and contrast to noise ratio(CNR)of pancreas were measured.The ANOVA test was performed in comparison with objective parameters of different reconstruction algorithms,and LSD test was performed in pairwise comparison.The subjective image scores were obtained and were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test.Results CT value,SD,SNR and CNR of non-contrast,arterial phase,parenchymal phase and delay phase had significant difference among different reconstruction images of routine dose group and low dose group(all P<0.05).The CT value of LD-FBP,LD-AIDR,and LD-DLR images were significantly higher than those of RD-AIDR images in parenchymal phase and delay phase(all P<0.05).There were statistically significant differences in each pairwise comparison of SD and SNR of four phase images(all P<0.05).There were statistically significant differences of CNR among LD-FBP,LD-DLR and RD-AIDR in four phase images(all P<0.05).The CNR of RD-AIDR was better than that of LD-FBP,and CNR of LD-DLR was better than that of RD-AIDR.DLR algorithm improved the SD,SNR and CNR of four phases of pancreatic images.The improvement of SNR was more significant after contrast enhancement,and the improvement of CNR was more significant in the non-contrast and delay phases.Subjective image scores of different reconstruction images were statistically different in four phase images(all P<0.001).Overall image scores of LD-DLR and RD-AIDR had no significant differences in four phase(Z value of four phases were 1.00,2.24,0.45 and 1.34,respectively;P value of four phases were 0.317,0.025,0.655 and 0.180,respectively).Conclusion The DLR technology can decrease radiation dose of pancreatic CT,improve image quality and satisfy diagnostic requirement.The DLR technology can also reduce image noise,improve the SNR and CNR in low dose contrast-enhanced pancreatic CT.
作者 吴巧玲 王沄 王希恒 马壮飞 薛华丹 金征宇 Wu Qiaoling;Wang Yun;Wang Xiheng;Ma Zhuangfei;Xue Huadan;Jin Zhengyu(Department of Radiology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijng 100730,China;Department of Clinical Research,Canon Medical System(China)CO,LTD,Beijing 100015,China)
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第4期437-442,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 胰腺 体层摄影术 X线计算机 深度学习算法 辐射剂量 Pancreas Tomography,X-ray computed Deep learning reconstruction algorithm Radiation dosage
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1Varut Vardhanabhuti,Richard D. Riordan,Grant R. Mitchell,Christopher Hyde,Carl A. Roobottom.??Image Comparative Assessment Using Iterative Reconstructions: Clinical Comparison of Low-Dose Abdominal/Pelvic Computed Tomography Between Adaptive Statistical, Model-Based Iterative Reconstructions and Traditional Filtered Back Projection in 65 Patients(J)Investigative Radiology . 2014 (4)
  • 2Singh Sarabjeet,Kalra Mannudeep K,Do Synho,Thibault Jean Baptiste,Pien Homer,Connor Owen O J,Blake Michael A.Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen. Journal of Computational Finance . 2012
  • 3Koichiro Yasaka,Masaki Katsura,Masaaki Akahane,Jiro Sato,Izuru Matsuda,Kuni Ohtomo.??Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction(J)SpringerPlus . 2013 (1)
  • 4CH McCollough,GH Chen,W Kalender,S Leng,E Samei,K Taguchi,G Wang,L Yu,RI Pettigrew.Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. Radiology . 2012
  • 5AAPM Task Group.Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE)in pediatric and adult body 324 325 CT Examinations:report of AAPM Task Group 204. http//www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt204 . 2014
  • 6Khawaja RD,Singh S,Blake M,Harisinghani M,Choy G,Karosmangulu A,Padole A,Do S,Brown K,Thompson R,Morton T,Raihani N,Koehler T,Kalra MK.Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT:using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study. European Journal of Radiology . 2015
  • 7Sarabjeet Singh,Mannudeep K. Kalra,Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja,Atul Padole,Sarvenaz Pourjabbar,Diego Lira,Jo-Anne O. Shepard,Subba R. Digumarthy.??Radiation Dose Optimization and Thoracic Computed Tomography(J)Radiologic Clinics of North America . 2014 (1)
  • 8Sarvenaz Pourjabbar,Sarabjeet Singh,Anand K. Singh,Rocio P. Johnston,Anuradha S. Shenoy-Bhangle,Synho Do,Atul Padole,Michael A. Blake,Anders Persson,Mannudeep K. Kalra.??Preliminary Results: Prospective Clinical Study to Assess Image-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Abdominal Computed Tomography Acquired at 2 Radiation Dose Levels(J)Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography . 2014 (1)
  • 9B. Dustin Pooler,Meghan G. Lubner,David H. Kim,Eva M. Ryckman,Sri Sivalingam,Jie Tang,Stephen Y. Nakada,Guang-Hong Chen,Perry J. Pickhardt.??Prospective Trial for the Detection of Urolithiasis at Ultra-low-dose (Sub-mSv) Non-contrast CT: Direct Comparison against Routine Low-dose Reference Standard(J)The Journal of Urology . 2014
  • 10Kalra Mannudeep K,Woisetschl?ger Mischa,Dahlstr?m Nils,Singh Sarabjeet,Lindblom Maria,Choy Garry,Quick Petter,Schmidt Bernhard,Sedlmair Martin,Blake Michael A,Persson Anders.Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography. Journal of Computational Finance . 2012

共引文献18

同被引文献79

引证文献11

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部