摘要
目的对比间苯三酚注射液与山莨菪碱注射液治疗急诊老年痉挛性腹痛的临床效果。方法选取2020年2月至2021年2月我院急诊科收治的90例老年痉挛性腹痛患者,依据治疗方法不同分为A组(n=45,采用间苯三酚注射液治疗)和B组(n=45,采用山莨菪碱注射液治疗)。比较两组患者的腹痛消失时间、疼痛程度、临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果A组的腹痛消失时间短于B组,VAS评分低于B组(P<0.05)。A组的治疗总有效率为97.78%,高于B组的84.44%(P<0.05)。A组的不良反应发生率为2.22%,低于B组的17.78%(P<0.05)。结论与山莨菪碱注射液相比,间苯三酚注射液治疗急诊老年痉挛性腹痛的临床效果更佳,安全性更高,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of phloroglucinol injection and anisodamine injection in the treatment of emergency elderly spastic abdominal pain.Methods 90 elderly patients with spastic abdominal pain admitted to our Emergency Department from February 2020 to February 2021 were selected and divided into group A(n=45,phloroglucinol injection)and group B(n=45,anisodamine injection)according to different treatment methods.The disappearance time of abdominal pain,pain degree,clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The disappearance time of abdominal pain in group A was shorter than that in group B,and the VAS score was lower than that in group B(P<0.05).The total effective rate of treatment in group A was 97.78%,higher than 84.44% in group B(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was 2.22%,lower than 17.78% in group B(P<0.05).Conclusions Compared with anisodamine injection,phloroglucinol injection has better clinical effect and higher safety in the treatment of emergency elderly spastic abdominal pain,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
作者
张磊
任淑芳
ZHANG Lei;REN Shufang(Emergency Department,Pingdingshan First People's Hospital,Pingdingshan 467000,China)
出处
《临床医学工程》
2022年第5期663-664,共2页
Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词
急诊
老年痉挛性腹痛
间苯三酚注射液
山莨菪碱注射液
不良反应
Emergency
Elderly spastic abdominal pain
Phloroglucinol injection
Anisodamine injection
Adverse reaction