摘要
西方思想界有两种相对的东方主义,一种是肯定西方丑化东方的“正写欧洲中心主义”,另一种是批判西方美化东方的“反写欧洲中心主义”。考察后者即东方启蒙话语谱系及其历史语境可知,强调东方的积极面,起点是要解决西方现代转向及之后的问题,是西方在其特定历史语境中自我批判和反思的手段,反映了西方思想的张力和活力,我们征用其批判修辞的同时应警惕其中的陷阱。
There are two kinds of opposite Orientalism in western ideological circle.One is“pro-Eurocentrism”,which affirms the West and vilifies the East,while the other is“anti-Eurocentrism”,which criticizes the West and beautifies the East.This study focuses on the latter as a genealogy of Oriental Enlightenment Discourse with its own historical context.It is perceived that,to emphasize the positive side of the East,the starting point is to solve the modern turn of the West and the problems thereafter.And this is a means of self-criticism and reflection of the West in its specific historical context,reflecting the tension and vitality of western thought.While expropriating its critical rhetoric,we should be aware of the hidden traps in it.
作者
许玉军
XU Yun-jun(School of Foreign Languages,Jimei University,Xiamen,Fujian 361021,China)
出处
《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第1期120-125,165,共7页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学研究一般项目“美国左翼戏剧的多元批判向度与国家认同研究”(19BWW065)的阶段性成果。
关键词
东方主义
东方启蒙
欧洲中心论
Orientalism
Oriental Enlightenment
Eurocentrism