期刊文献+

不同黏度骨水泥经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的有效性与安全性Meta分析

Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous kyphoplasty with different viscosity bone cement in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture:a meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价不同黏度骨水泥经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的有效性与安全性。方法计算机检索自建库至2021年4月18日收录在中国知网(CNKI)、万方(Wanfang)、维普(VIP)、PubMed、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、The Cochrane library等数据库的文献,搜索有关PKP中采用高低黏度骨水泥治疗OVCF的随机对照试验(RCT)文献,并以手工检索相关论文。由2位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料及评价纳入研究的方法学质量后,采用Review 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入12篇RCT文献,共1089例患者,其中高黏度组544例,低黏度组545例。Meta分析结果表明:与对照组相比,研究组在降低术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(MD=-0.43,95%CI:-0.67~-0.19,P<0.01)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)(MD=-3.89,95%CI:-6.32~-1.47,P<0.01)、Cobb角(MD=-1.78,95%CI:-2.08~-1.48,P<0.00001)、减少骨水泥注入量(MD=-0.18,95%CI:-0.34~-0.02,P<0.05)、缩短手术时间(MD=-6.91,95%CI:-12.84~-0.99,P<0.05)和恢复伤椎高度(MD=3.01,95%CI:1.15~4.86,P<0.01)方面均明显优于对照组;与对照组相比,研究组在降低术后骨水泥渗漏率(RR=0.40,95%CI:0.32~0.51,P<0.01)和其他并发症发生率(RR=0.55,95%CI:0.39~0.78,P<0.01)方面均明显低于对照组。结论与低黏度骨水泥相比,PKP中选用高黏度骨水泥具备更好的临床疗效及安全性。然而,上述结论仍需更多高质量、多中心的RCT进一步证实。 Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)with different viscosity bone cement in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCF).Methods Databases including CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,PubMed,CBM,and the Cochrane Library were searched for collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs)related to high and low viscosity bone cement in the treatment of OVCF during PKP,and the search time limit was from the establishment to April 18,2021.Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to make a quality assessment.Moreover,related papers were retrieved manually.After two evaluators independently selected literature,extracted data,and evaluated the quality of methodology included in the study,Review 5.3 software was used to analyze the meta-analysis.Results A total of 12 RCT articles were included,including 1089 patients(544 cases in high viscosity group,and 545 cases in low viscosity group).The results of the meta-analysis showed that the study group was better than the control group after surgery in reducing the mean visual analogue scale(VAS)scores(MD=-0.43,95%CI:-0.67 to-0.19,P<0.01),the mean Oswestry Disability Index(ODI)(MD=-3.89,95%CI:-6.32,-1.47,P<0.01),the Cobb angle(MD=-1.78,95%CI:-2.08 to-1.48,P<0.01),reduce the cement injection volume(MD=-0.18,95%CI:-0.34 to-0.02,P<0.05),shorten the operation time(MD=-6.91,95%CI:-12.84 to-0.99,P<0.05),recovery of injured vertebral height[MD=3.01,95%CI(1.15 to 4.86),P<0.01].the study group was lower than the control group after surgery in reducing leakage rate of bone cement(RR=0.40,95%CI:0.32 to 0.51,P<0.01),incidence of other complications(RR=0.55,95%CI:0.39 to 0.78,P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with low viscosity bone cement,high viscosity bone cement in PKP has better clinical efficacy and safety.However,the above conclusions still need to be further confirmed by more high-quality,multi-center RCTs.
作者 卜献忠 卜若晨 卜保献 秦百君 麦威 万通 蒋志雄 钟远鸣 BU Xian-zhong;BU Ruo-chen;BU Bao-xian;QIN Bai-jun;MAI Wei;WAN Tomg;JIANG Zhi-xiong;ZHONG Yuan-ming(Graduate School,Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine,Nanning 530001,Guangxi,CHINA;Hainan Medical University,Haikou 570102,Hainan,CHINA;Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province(Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital),Luoyang 471002,Henan,CHINA;Department of Orthopedics(Spinal Surgery),the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine,Nanning 530023,Guangxi,CHINA)
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2022年第9期1198-1205,共8页 Hainan Medical Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:81760874) 广西重点研发计划(编号:桂科AB20159018) 河南省中医药科学研究专项课题(编号:20-21ZY2083) 中医学广西一流学科项目(编号:桂教科研【2018】12号) 广西中医药大学2021年博士研究生科研创新项目(编号:YCBXJ2021009)。
关键词 骨质疏松性骨折 PKP 高黏度骨水泥 低黏度骨水泥 META分析 Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture Percutaneous kyphoplasty High viscosity bone cement Low viscosity bone cement Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

二级参考文献216

  • 1中国藏学出版社新书简介[J].中国藏学,2002(3):148-154. 被引量:1
  • 2张思胜.经皮椎体成形术的临床应用现状及发展方向[J].中国骨伤,2004,17(11):702-704. 被引量:2
  • 3郑召民,李佛保.经皮椎体成形术和经皮椎体后凸成形术——问题与对策[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(27):1878-1880. 被引量:222
  • 4Farrokhi M,Nouraei H,Kiani A. The efficacy of percuta?neous vertebroplasty in the pain relief in patients with pathological vertebal fractures due to metastatic spinal tumors[J]. Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2012, 14 (g) : 523- 530.
  • 5Itshayek E, Miller P, Barzilay y, et al. Vertebral augmen?tation in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: review and new insights from recent studies[J]. Clin Neu?rosci,2012,9(6) :786-791.
  • 6Ma R,Chow R, Shen FH. Kummell's disease: delayed postt?raumatic osteonecrosis of the vertebral body[J]. Eur Spine J, 2010,19(7):1065-1070.
  • 7Li CH,Chang MC,Liu CL,et al. Osteoporotic burst frac?ture with spinal canal compromise treated with percutane?ous vertebroplasty[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2010, 112 (8) : 678-681.
  • 8Kaufmann TJ, Trout AT, Kallmes DF. The effects of ce?ment volume on clinical outcomes of percutaneous verte?broplasty [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2006, 27 (9) : 1933-1937.
  • 9Tanigawa N, Komemushi A, Kariya S, et al. Relationship between cement distribution pattern and new compression fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty CJJ. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007,189(6) : 348-352.
  • 10Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ ,et al. Percutaneous verte?broplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilisation[J], Spine, 2000,25(22):923-928.

共引文献240

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部