公共企事业单位信息公开诉讼研究

On Information Disclosure Litigation in Public Enterprises and Institutions

公共企事业单位能否作为公开主体,无论在信息公开理论中,还是在实务中,都是一个相对小众化的问题。整理考察中国裁判文书网相关案件的结果是,在为数不多的以公共企事业单位作为信息公开诉讼被告的案件中,一部分判决以传统的行政主体理论为由,将案件以主体不适格为由驳回起诉,而另一部分判决则直接回避被告的主体资格问题,认为拒绝公开具有其合理性而判决驳回诉讼请求。对公共企事业单位信息公开方面的行政诉讼进行论证,对于理论的拓展以及审判实务中的探索都具有重要意义,填补理论中对公共企事业单位信息公开案件在诉讼上研究的空白,为审判实务中遇到的困境寻求新的应对思路。

Whether public enterprises and institutions can serve as the subject of disclosure in theory of information disclosure or in practice is a niche issue.By investigating Chinese referee document net,we can fi nd the following results:in a few such cases in which public enterprises and institutions are viewed as the litigation defendant of information disclosure,some judgments adhere to the traditional theory of administrative subject and reject the case on the grounds that the subject is not qualifi ed;while other judgments directly avoid the subject qualifi cation of the defendant,and reject the suit on the grounds that the refusal to make public is reasonable.The study on the administrative litigation of information disclosure in public enterprises and institutions is of great signifi cance for the development of theory and the exploration of trial practice.The study can fi ll up the theoretical blank on administrative litigation of information disclosure in public enterprises and institutions,and seek new solutions to the diffi culties encountered in the trial practice.