期刊文献+

市场理论的“实践关系”本体转向及其命题形式 被引量:1

Ontological turn of "practical relationship" in market theory and its proposition form
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “市场”被定义为“交易场所”与“交换关系”是典型的“S是P”的实体本体论定义判断,如此导致当前市场学说众说纷纭并莫衷一是。通过梳理近现代西学市场的经济学与经济社会学研究,表明市场本体虽从“交换场所”转向“交换关系”,但仍把后者作为一种市场属性看待。西学市场理论遮蔽了市场作为一种人类社会规划性的制度设计,其背后的意识形态性、制度性、历史性与理论立场。借助我国“市”和“场”的原初含义、当代“非实体关系实在论”本体论转向和对马克思、布迪厄、吉登斯等实践观的运用,阐明了市场本体是“实践关系”。并由此,按照语言分析学提倡思路,提出“对……而言,市场是……的实践关系”的命题形式,旨在表明不同市场理论运用的语境有效性。 "Market"is defined as a"trading place"oran"exchange relationship",which is a typical entity ontology definition judgment of"S is P",arousing many disputes and disagreements in the current market theory.It′s found from combing the economics and economic sociology research of modern western marketthat although the market ontology has changed from"exchange place"to"exchange relationship",the latter is still regarded as a market attribute.Western market theory obscures the ideological,institutional,historical and theoretical position behind the market as a planned institutional design of human society.Based on the original understanding of China′s"shi"(市)and"chang"(场),the ontological turn of contemporary"non entity relationship realism"and the application of Marx,Bourdieu,Giddens and other practical views,this paper expounds that the market ontology is a"practical relationship".Therefore,according to the idea advocated by language analysis,this paper puts forward the proposition form of"for…,the market is the practical relationship of…",which aims to show the contextual effectiveness of the application of different market theories.
作者 赵飘飘 陈林生 沈迪尔 孙茂然 ZHAOPiaopiao;CHEN Linsheng;SHEN Di′er;SUN Maoran(School of Law and Politics,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出处 《浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第2期202-211,共10页 Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University:Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(16BSH071) 浙江理工大学科研业务费专项(2021Q080)。
关键词 市场理论 本体论 交换关系 关系实在论 实践关系 命题形式 market theory ontology exchange relationship relational realism practical relationship proposition form
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1仰海峰.从实践到一定的社会关系——马克思唯物史观的深层逻辑转换[J].理论探讨,1998(2):47-52. 被引量:6
  • 2胡新和,罗嘉昌.从物理实在观的变革到关系实在论[J].自然辩证法通讯,1993,15(3):10-18. 被引量:8
  • 3马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第46卷(上)[M].北京:人民出版社,2003:170.
  • 4罗嘉昌.从物质实体到关系实在[M】.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
  • 5马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M】.北京:人民出版社,1998.
  • 6White, H C. Where do markets come from?[J] American Journal of Sociology, 1981, (87) :517--547.
  • 7Burt, R, Structural holes. The social structure of competition [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
  • 8Podolny, J M. A status-based model of market competition [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1993, (98) : 829-872.
  • 9Granovetter M. Getting a job: a study of contacts and careers [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.
  • 10Baker, W E, The social structure of a national securities market[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1984, (89) :775-- 811.

共引文献12

同被引文献43

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部