腹腔镜疝修补术和传统无张力疝修补术术后恢复的分析

Analysis of Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Hernia Repair and Traditional Tension-Free Hernia Repair

目的:探究腹腔镜疝修补术和传统无张力疝修补术的手术疗效及其对患者术后恢复的影响。方法:选取2018年7月~2020年7月本院收治的60例腹股沟疝患者,以随机法分组研究,每组30例。对照组行传统无张力疝修补术治疗,试验组行腹腔镜疝修补术治疗,对比两组的手术效果。结果:试验组的手术总有效率(96.66%)显著高于对照组(80.00%),P<0.05。试验组的术后恢复指标除腹股沟异物感消失时间无显著差异外,其余均明显优于对照组,且并发症情况也少于对照组,P<0.05。结论:腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果突出。

Objective:To investigate the operative efficacy of laparoscopic hernia repair and traditional tension-free hernia repair and its effect on postoperative recovery of patients.Methods:A total of 60 patients with inguinal hernia who were admitted to our hospital from July 2018 to July 2020 were selected and randomly divided into groups,with 30 cases in each group.The control group was treated with traditional tension-free hernia repair,and the experimental group was treated with laparoscopic hernia repair.The surgical effects of the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate of surgery in the experimental group(96.66%)was significantly higher than that in the control group(80.00%),P<0.05.The postoperative recovery indicators of the experimental group were significantly better than the control group except for the disappearance time of foreign body sensation in the groin,and the complications were also lower than those of the control group,P<0.05.Conclusion:TAPP is effective in treating inguinal hernia.