法学继受对法学研究及法学教育的连锁影响——以德国法教义学在我国台湾地区之继受为例的反思

Chain Effect of Legal Succession on Legal Studies and Legal Education

当我们今天讨论法学研究和法学教育应当主要朝向什么方向发展以及具体如何进行调整时,与其是以德国或美国的情况作为参考样版来径直断定我们应如何效仿行事,还不如先来仔细考察那些大规模进行某种法学继受的地区的现状(特别是其中存在的弊病),进而以一种后见之明对法学继受过程当中应当注意避免的一些重要问题形成清醒认识。就此而言,以我国台湾地区法学界长期以来大规模继受德国法教义学为实例进行细致检视,并反思这一持续至今的法学继受过程给当地法学界学术生态带来的各种连锁影响,可以为我们在当下谨慎思考中国大陆法学研究与法学教育的主要发展方向之选择,以及自身法学的主体性意识之培养,提供某种必要的警醒。

When discussing the direction in which our legal research and legal education should be adjusted and how to adjust it,instead of using the situation of Germany or the United States as a reference template to directly determine how we should follow suit,we should better first examine the current situation of legal academia in those areas where large-scale legal reception has carried out(especially the chain disadvantages brought by this process),and then form a clear understanding of some problems that should be avoided in the process of legal reception with a kind of hindsight.With regard to this,to examine the large-scale reception of German legal science in Taiwan region of China,and reflect on the various chain influences of this continuous legal reception process on the ecology of local legal academia,can provide us with a necessary reminder of the choice of the main development directions of legal research and legal education in Chinese mainland,as well as the cultivation of the subjective consciousness of the local legal science.