期刊文献+

国际投资仲裁准据法的平衡适用论 被引量:3

On the Balanced Application of the Applicable Law in International Investment Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国签订的双边投资保护协定中对于准据法的选择大多采用复合模式,带有很强的“战略模糊性”,因此,有必要研究投资争议中国际法与东道国国内法各自的法律功能以及两者之间的适用关系。从已有投资仲裁判例所呈现出来的规律来看,应从利益分配的实体视角出发,在投资协定的框架下追求东道国与投资母国之间的利益协调最大化。仲裁庭在准据法适用时应承认和尊重东道国国内法中所体现的公共利益,通过形式判断、实体解构和程序保障三个维度实现准据法的适用平衡。 The choice of applicable law clauses in most BITs signed by China have the characteristics of“strategic ambiguity”.Therefore,it is necessary to confirm the respective legal functions and the relationship of China’s international law and the host state’s municipal law in investment disputes.Based on the laws of the existing investment arbitration cases,it is considered that the interest coordination between the host state and the investment home country should be maximized from the entity perspective of interest distribution under the framework of investment agreement.When applying the applicable law,the arbitral tribunal should recognize and respect the public interests embodied in the municipal law of the host state,and realize the application balance of the applicable law through three dimensional paths,namely formal judgment,substantive deconstruction and procedural guarantee.
作者 宋阳 SONG Yang(Law School,Hebei University,Baoding 071000,China)
机构地区 河北大学法学院
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期194-205,共12页 Modern Law Science
基金 河北省高校青年拔尖人才项目“数字贸易商业规则发展及中国因应研究”(BJ2020061)。
关键词 投资仲裁 准据法 平衡适用 利益协调 investment arbitration applicable law balanced application interest coordination
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献69

  • 1余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:37
  • 2LG&E Energy Corp. et al. v The Republic of Argentina. ICSID ease no. ARB/02/1 (2006) ;Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/O3/gA, award of 5 September 2008.
  • 3See Anthea Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int' l. L. 179 (2010).
  • 4See William W. Burke -White & Andreas yon Stadan, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Time: The Interpretation and Application of Nort - Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 48 Va. J. Int' l L. (2008) 307, 376 - 81.
  • 5Id., 320-324,.
  • 6CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic, ICSID case no. ARB/01/08, 12) (annulment proceeding). Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, para. 128 - 136.
  • 7Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/02/16 ( Annulment Proceeding), Decision on the Argentine Re- public' s Request for Annulment of the Award, 29 June 2010.
  • 8See Anne van Aakenand Jurgen Kurtz, Prudence or Discrimination? Emergency Measures, The Global Financial Crisis and International Economic Law, 12 J. Int' l Econ. L. 859 (2009).
  • 9SGS v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction( August 6 2003 ) [ EB/OL]. Para. 166.
  • 10Id. , Para. 168.

共引文献196

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部