期刊文献+

在线健康社区中语言风格对信息可信度影响研究综述 被引量:1

Research review of the impact of the language style on information credibility in the online health community
下载PDF
导出
摘要 梳理当前在线健康社区(OHC)交流中语言风格对信息可信度的影响,对其深入分析有助于把握在线健康社区用户的交流规律及心理模式,有利于促进在线健康社区环境下医患信任的建立。本研究通过系统综述方法,从信息来源与信息内容2个维度展开分析,较为详尽地梳理主要成果与研究现状。语言风格能体现出信息来源的专业程度、能力以及信息内容的知识体系与复杂程度,影响信息可信度的感知。有关医生如何调整语言风格有利于提高信息可信度方面研究结论存在不一致,需进一步研究。 This study aimed to understand the influence of language style on credibility in the current online health community(OHC)communication,an indepth analysis is helpful to grasp the communication rules and psychological patterns of online health community users,and to promote the establishment of doctor-patient trust in the online health community environment.In this study,the main achievements and research status are combed in detail by using systematic review method,which is analyzed from two dimensions of information source and information content.The results show that language style can reflect the professional level and ability of information sources,as well as the knowledge system and complexity of information content,and affect the perception of information credibility.There are different conclusions about how doctors adjust their language style to improve their credibility,which needs further study.
作者 黄晨欣 刘静 马敬东 Huang Chenxin;Liu Jing;Ma Jingdong(School of Medical and Health Management,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,Hubei Province,China)
出处 《中国数字医学》 2022年第1期111-118,共8页 China Digital Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目-互联网医疗环境下慢病服务互动价值形成机制与价值融合模式研究(71974065)。
关键词 在线健康社区 语言风格 信息可信度 系统综述 Online health community Language style Information credibility Systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献104

  • 1郑智斌,邓兰花.网络个人信源及其可信度分析[J].情报理论与实践,2008,31(6):857-859. 被引量:8
  • 2Collins B R. Webwatch[J]. Library Journal, 1996, 32-33.
  • 3Beredjiklian P K, Bozentika D J, Steinberg D R, et al. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedie information on the Internet: The Case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome[J]. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American, 2000, 82 (11):1540-1542.
  • 4Fricke M, Fallis D. Indicators Of accuracy for answers to ready reference questions on the internet [J], Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 2004, 55(3) :238-245.
  • 5Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O,et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review[J]. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002, 287:2691-2700.
  • 6Grimes D J, Boening C H. Worries with the web: A look at student use of web resourcesrJ'l. College & Research Libraries,2001, 62(1): 11 - 23.
  • 7Friedlander A. Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environmentl'EB/OL]. 1"2013-02-20"1. http://www. clir. org/pubs/reperts/pub110/reports/pub110/contents, html.
  • 8Princeton Survey Research Associates. A Matter of Trust: What Users Want From Web Sites[EB/OL]. [2013-02- 23]. http://www. consumerwebwatch, org/pdfs/a-matter-of-trust, pdf.
  • 9Graham L, Metaxas P T. Of course it's true; I saw it on the Internetl : Critical thinking in the Internet erar[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2003,46(5) :70-75.
  • 10TRUSTe. Press and News[EB/OL].[2013-02-21]. http://www.truste. com/about-TRUSTe/press-room/.

共引文献105

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部