期刊文献+

Error modeling and compensating of a novel 6-DOF aeroengine rotor docking equipment 被引量:3

原文传递
导出
摘要 In the docking process of aeroengine rotor parts,docking accuracy that indicates the gaps between the end faces is strictly required.A key issue is improving docking accuracy using automated docking equipment.In this paper,a systematic study is carried out on the error modeling and compensation of a novel six-degrees-of-freedom(6-DOF)docking equipment for aeroengine rotors.First,a new model for indicating the main indexes of docking accuracy is proposed.Then,the error model of a specially designed 6-DOF docking equipment is established based on a modified Denavit Hartenberg method with five parameters.Subsequently,two error compensation methods are proposed.Based on the above models,a docking accuracy simulation algorithm is proposed using the Monte Carlo method.Finally,verification experiments are conducted.The results show that,for the maximum values and standard deviations of the gaps between the rotor end-faces in the actual and target positions and attitudes,i.e.,main indexes that represent docking accuracy,the deviation rates between the simulation and experimental results are less than20%.The modeling methods have referential significance.The decline rates of these values are 50–65%when using the two proposed compensation methods.The compensation methods significantly improve the docking accuracy.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2022年第6期312-324,共13页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 supported by Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51621064)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1Yanhong MA,Yongfeng WANG,Cun WANG,Jie HONG.Nonlinear interval analysis of rotor response with joints under uncertainties[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2020,33(1):205-218. 被引量:9
  • 2General Aviation Manufacturers Association. 2008 general aviation statistical databook & industry outlook. 2009.
  • 3General Aviation Manufacturers Association. General aviation's contribution to the U.S. economy. 2006.
  • 4ARP4754. Certification considerations for highlyin- tegrated or complex aircraft systems. SAE International, 1996.
  • 5ARP4761. Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipment. SAE International, 1996.
  • 6Zentner I, Tarantola S, de Rocquigny E. Sensitivity analysis for reliable design verification of nuclear tur- bosets. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2011; 96(3): 391-397.
  • 7de "Rocquigny E, Devictor N, Tarantola S. Uncertainty inindustrial practice: a guide to quantitative uncertainty management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
  • 8Helton J C, Johnson J D, Sallabary C J, et al. Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2006; 91(10): 1175-1209.
  • 9Saltelii A, Ratto M, Tarantola S, et al. Sensitivity analysis practices: strategies for model-based inference. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2006; 91(10): 1109-1125.
  • 10Iman R L, Hora S C. A robust measure of uncertainty importance for use in fault tree system analysis. Risk Analysis 1990; 10(3): 401-406.

共引文献25

同被引文献102

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部