摘要
传统犯罪的网络异化主要表现为行为对象的数字化与行为方式的电子化。解释论立场的对立在具体路径上表现为主观文义解释与客观文义解释之争。网络时代刑法解释的目标是解析刑法条文在当前时代背景下的规范意义,应当舍主观文义解释而择客观文义解释。目的解释在存在论意义上只可能是主观的,客观目的解释这一解释方法存在先天的逻辑缺陷。主观目的解释可以与客观解释论立场兼容。同类解释规则可以视作主观目的解释对体系解释的补充,对“同类”的判断应当重视行为的实质可罚性。
The alienation of traditional crimes in cyberspace is mainly manifested in the virtualization of behavioral objects and the networking of behavioral methods. The confrontation of the interpretive position is expressed in the specific path of criminal law interpretation as the dispute between subjective and objective interpretation. The goal of criminal law interpretation in the network era is to analyze the normative meaning of criminal law provisions in the current context,and should choose objective interpretation instead of subjective interpretation. Purposive interpretation can only be subjective in an existential sense,and there is an inherent logical defect in the interpretation method of objective purpose interpretation. Subjective purposive interpretation can be compatible with an objective interpretivist position. Congeneric interpretation rules can be regarded as the supplement of subjective purpose interpretation to system interpretation. The understanding and judgment of “congeneric” should pay attention to the substantive penalties of behavior.
作者
陆一敏
Lu Yimin(School of East China University of Political Science and Law)
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期101-120,共20页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“网络时代的社会治理与刑法体系的理论创新”(20&ZD199)的阶段性成果。
关键词
客观解释论
文义解释
主观目的解释
体系解释
同类解释规则
Objective Interpretation Theory
Literary Interpretation
Subjective Purpose Interpretation
System Interpretation
Congeneric Interpretation Rules