期刊文献+

科技伦理治理原则辨析及理念传播 被引量:5

Discrimination of the Governance Principles of Science and Technology Ethics and Dissemination of Ideas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 负责任的研究与创新要求加强伦理治理。《关于加强科技伦理治理的意见》提出了五个伦理原则:增进人类福祉、尊重生命权利、坚持公平公正、合理控制风险和保持公开透明。通过对这五个伦理原则的理念、要点和难点进行解读,提出了三点加强科技伦理教育的建议:第一,优化高校相关专业科技伦理课程设置,帮助青年学生认识伦理原则,树立正确的科技伦理观。第二,高校要开展教师、研究者、管理者和伦理委员会委员的教育培训,积极探索在线科研伦理培训和效果评价。第三,高校教师开设的专业课程中应有机融入课程思政的内容,起到警示作用。 Ethical governance is inherent in responsible research and innovation.The Opinions on Strengthening Ethical Governance of Science and Technology puts forward five ethical principles:promoting human well-being,respecting the right to life,adhering to fairness and justice,reasonably controlling risks and maintaining openness and transparency.This paper interpreted the ideas,key points and difficulties of these five ethical principles.Three suggestions were put forward to strengthen the ethics education of science and technology:first,optimize the curriculum of science and technology ethics for related majors in colleges and universities,and help young students understand ethical principles and establish the correct ethics view of science and technology;second,colleges and universities should carry out education and training for teachers,researchers,managers and members of ethics committees,and actively explore scientific research ethics training and effect evaluation;third,the professional courses offered by college teachers should be organically integrated with the ideological and political content of the courses to play a warning role.
作者 张新庆 ZHANG Xinqing(School of Marxism, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;School of Humanities and Social Science, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China)
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2022年第5期479-482,共4页 Chinese Medical Ethics
关键词 科技伦理治理 伦理原则 科技伦理教育 理念传播 Ethical Governance of Science and Technology Ethical Principles Ethical Education of Science and Technology Dissemination of Idea
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献37

  • 1樊春良.科学与治理的兴起及其意义[J].科学学研究,2005,23(1):7-13. 被引量:34
  • 2西尔万.拉维勒.科技中国论坛——科技进步与社会协同治理的国际思考——协同治理的精神——对现代技术.伦理和民主的质疑及解决的途径[J].科技中国,2005(6):64-69. 被引量:2
  • 3雅克·蒂洛,基思·克拉斯曼.伦理学与生活[M].世界图书出版公司.2008.
  • 4UNESCO. The Ethics and politics of Nanotechnology [R]. 2006, 5.
  • 5Jennifer Pelley, Marc Saner. International Approaches to the Regulatory Governance of Nanotechnology [ R]. Regulatory Governance Initiative, Carleton University. April 2009, 49.
  • 6联合国教科文组织科学与技术伦理司.建立生命伦理委员会(指南1)[R].法国巴黎,2005.68-71.
  • 7S . Funtowicez. et al. Science and Governance in the European Union: A Contribution to the Debate[ R]. Science and Public Policy, October 2000.
  • 8Dimitris Kyriakou and Giorgio di Pietro , EDITORIAL, The IPTS Report on Science & Governance [ J ]. June 2000. 6.
  • 9S. Glynn, etc. Science and Governance: Describing and Typifying Scientific Advice Structures [ R ]. IPTS Report 2001. 13 - 16;24.
  • 10John de la Mothe. Science, Tehnology and Governance [ M]. Continuum. 2001.

共引文献116

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部