颅脑损伤患者应对方式与创伤后成长水平的相关性

Correlation between coping style and post-traumatic growth level in patients with craniocerebral injuries

目的:探讨颅脑损伤患者应对方式与创伤后成长水平的相关性。方法:选取60例颅脑损伤患者为研究对象,于入院次日采用简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)评估患者术后应对方式,同期采用创伤后成长评定量表(PTGI)评估患者创伤后成长水平,采用Pearson相关性分析探讨颅脑损伤患者应对方式与创伤后成长水平的相关性。结果:60例颅脑损伤患者中积极应对41例,消极应对19例;积极应对组性别、年龄、体质量指数、疾病类型、文化水平、致伤原因、颅脑损伤程度与消极应对组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);积极应对组对生活欣赏、个人力量、新可能性、与他人关系、精神变化评分及总分均高于消极应对组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经Pearson分析结果显示,颅脑损伤患者应对方式与创伤后成长水平中对生活欣赏、个人力量、新可能性、与他人关系、精神变化评分及总分均呈正相关(r>0,P<0.05)。结论:颅脑损伤患者应对方式与创伤后成长水平呈正相关。

Objective: To explore correlation between coping style and post-traumatic growth level in patients with craniocerebral injuries. Methods: 60 with craniocerebral injuries were selected as the research objects. The postoperative coping style was assessed by the simple coping style questionnaire(SCSQ) on the next day after admission, and the post-traumatic growth level was assessed by the post traumatic growth inventory(PTGI) at the same time. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between coping style and post-traumatic growth level in these patients with craniocerebral injuries. Results: Among the 60 patients with craniocerebral injuries, 41 were actively coping, and 19 were passive coping. There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, disease type, educational level, cause of injury, and degree of craniocerebral injury between the active coping group and the passive coping group(P>0.05). The scores on life appreciation, personal strength, new possibility, relationship with others as well as mental change score and total score of the positive coping group were higher than those in the negative coping group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The Pearson analysis showed that the coping style of the patients with craniocerebral injuries was positively correlated with the life appreciation, personal strength, new possibility, relationship with others as well as mental change score and total score in post-traumatic growth level(r>0, P<0.05). Conclusions: The coping style of the patients with craniocerebral injuries is positively correlated with the post-traumatic growth level.