摘要
我国行为保全制度自2012年纳入《民事诉讼法》以来,在司法实践中运用并不多,相关内容无法落实,难以有效保护申请人的权利。无论是行为保全启动的主体,还是审查程序,抑或行为保全的执行,现阶段都存在一些问题。行为保全启动主体的争论,启动条件的标准概括过于模糊,行为保全审查期限是否合理,如何有效执行等问题,令行为保全在我国的实践中受到阻碍,因此,在法律层面需要进一步完善,才能推动行为保全在我国的发展。
Since my country′s behavior preservation system was incorporated into the"Civil Procedure Law"in 2012,it has not been used much in judicial practice.The relevant content cannot be implemented and it is difficult to effectively protect the rights of applicants.Whether it is the subject of the act preservation,the review procedure,or the execution of the act preservation,there are various problems in our country at this stage.The controversy of the initiating subject of behavior preservation,the criteria for the initiation conditions are too general and vague,whether the review period of behavior preservation is reasonable,how to effectively implement the behavior preservation,etc.,have hindered the practice of behavior preservation in our country,and it needs further legal aspects.Perfection can promote the development of behavior preservation in our country.
作者
白宝芬
郑玮洺
BAI Baofen;ZHENG Weiming(Law School,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610044,China)
出处
《盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)》
2022年第2期33-36,共4页
Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
行为保全
启动主体与条件
审查
执行
behavior preservation
initiating subject and conditions
review
execution