期刊文献+

临终护理工作心理准备度量表在诊疗重大传染病医护人员中应用的信效度分析

The reliability and validity analysis of the Self-Competence in Death Work Scale among clinical medical staff caring patient with epidemic disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对临终护理工作心理准备度量表进行修订并在诊疗重大传染病医护人员中检测其信效度。方法:通过便利抽样和滚雪球抽样法选取281名诊疗/护理新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)医护人员进行调查。结果:量表条目临界比决断值为14.23~38.62;条目分与总分相关系数为0.49~0.82。量表条目内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.86~1.00,量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.98。探索性因子分析提取2个公因子,解释总方差的64.5%。量表、现实认知准备和情绪应对准备维度Cronbach′sα系数为0.92,0.86和0.91;折半信度系数为0.88,0.80和0.88;重测信度为0.80,0.73和0.82。结论:简体中文版量表在诊疗重大传染病医护人员中运用时信效度良好。 Objective:To revised the Self-Competence in Death Work Scale and verify its reliability and validity among clinical medical staff caring patient with epidemic disease.Methods:A total of 281 medical staff in diagnosis/nursing of COVID-19 were recruited by convenient sampling and snowball sampling method.Results:Critical ratio determination values of scale items were 14.23~38.62;The correlation coefficients between items and total scores were 0.49~0.82.Contents validity index of scale items(I-CVI) ranged from 0.86 to 1.00,contents validity index of scale level(S-CVI) was 0.98.Exploratory factor analysis extracted two common factors, explaining the total variance of 64.5%.Cronbach′s α coefficients of scale, reality cognitive readiness and emotional coping readiness were 0.92,0.86 and 0.91.The half-fold reliability coefficients were 0.88,0.80 and 0.88.The retest reliabilities were 0.80,0.73 and 0.82.Conclusions:The reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese scale in diagnosis and treatment of major infectious diseases are good.
作者 唐娇 罗忠琛 薛科燕 TANG Jiao;LUO Zhongchen;XUE Keyan(School of Nursing,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016 China)
出处 《全科护理》 2022年第15期2017-2020,共4页 Chinese General Practice Nursing
基金 2020年贵州医科大学护理学科专项科研项目,编号:YJ20063。
关键词 临终护理工作心理准备度量表 医护人员 信度 效度 Self-Competence in Death Work Scale medical staff reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1黄玉顺.生存结构与心灵境界——面向21世纪的中国哲学[J].周易研究,2002(4):14-22. 被引量:11
  • 2王蔚.中日接受外来文化之心理学考察[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2005,28(2):110-112. 被引量:1
  • 3蒋艳 ,沈宁 ,邹树芳 .护理研究中量表研制及测量学特征的评定方法[J].中华护理教育,2005,2(4):174-176. 被引量:80
  • 4Denise FP. Essenlials of nursing research:appraising evidence for nursing practice[M]. 7th ed. Philadephia: Wohers Kluwer Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 2008:372-380.
  • 5Maria D,Rhidian H,Julia M,et al. Translating clinical Iools in nursing practice[J]. J Adv Nurs,2003,44(4) :420-426.
  • 6汪东向,王希林.马弘.心理卫生评定手册(增订版)[M].北京:中同心理卫生杂志社.1999.
  • 7Guillemin F,Bumbardier C,Beaton D. Crosultural adaptation of heahh-re- lated quality of' lifemeasures:literature review and proposed guidelines [J ].Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46(12) : 1417-1432.
  • 8International Council of Nurses(ICN). Translation guidelines lor iolerna- tional classification for nursing practice(ICNP)[M]. Geneva: lmprimerie ' Fornara,2008 : 1-16.
  • 9Huang TY,Moser DK,Hsieh YS,et al. Validation of Chinese version oftilethe Modified pulanhtars Fumctionstl Status and Dyspnea Questionnstinwith heart Litere patietas in Taiwan J .Vn tane ,2008.17.5:436-442.
  • 10Flaherly JA,Gavilia M,Pathak D,et al. Developing instruments for cross- cultural psychiatric research [ J]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1988,176(20):257- 263.

共引文献449

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部