期刊文献+

老年人营养不良筛查和评估初始量表的构建

Development of a preliminary version of screening and assessment tool for malnutrition in the elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的构建适用于我国老年人的营养不良筛查和评估初始量表。方法通过查阅文献,专家小组讨论,制定量表备选条目池。采用德尔菲专家咨询法,邀请老年医学及相关专业的专家,通过Email的方式发放专家咨询问卷(共两轮)。专家对各条目的重要性进行评分,并请专家对做出重要性评分的判断依据及对条目内容的熟悉程度进行评分。计算各条目的重要性得分、变异系数和满分比例,结合专家意见筛选条目,形成初始量表。结果两轮咨询分别回收专家咨询问卷16份和15份,专家积极系数为100%和93.75%。第一轮咨询筛查和评估量表专家权威系数为0.96±0.05和0.95±0.06,条目的重要性得分为4.53±0.19和4.19±0.38,变异系数为(19.38±4.89)%和(24.67±8.47)%,满分比例为(72.62±12.12)%和(51.39±17.19)%,Kendall协调系数为0.429和0.381(P<0.001)。第二轮咨询筛查和评估量表专家权威系数为0.96±0.06和0.95±0.06,条目的重要性得分为4.65±0.20和4.60±0.25,变异系数为(13.37±6.23)%和(14.43±6.56)%,满分比例为(73.83±15.03)%和(71.24±17.36)%,Kendall协调系数为0.319和0.228(P<0.001)。根据得分情况和专家意见,最终筛查初始量表入选10个条目,评估初始量表入选17个条目。结论通过德尔菲法构建了包含10个条目和17个条目的老年人营养不良筛查和评估初始量表。 Objective To develop a preliminary version of screening and assessment tool for malnutrition in Chinese elderly.Methods An item pool was established after literature review and panel discussion.The items were screened by using Delphi method.Experts in geriatrics and related regions were invited.Two rounds of survey questionnaire were implemented by form of Email.Experts were required to evaluate the items in terms of their importance and provide basis of judgement and degree of familiarity.A preliminary version of screening and assessment tool was determined after the items were screened according to average importance value,coefficient of variation and full score ratio.Results Sixteen and fifteen survey questionnaires were completed for the two rounds of consultation and the coefficients of positivity were 100%and 93.75%.In the first round,the degrees of authority were 0.96±0.05 and 0.95±0.06,the average importance scores of items being 4.53±0.19 and 4.19±0.38,the coefficients of variation being(19.38±4.89)%and(24.67±8.47)%,the full score ratios being(72.62±12.12)%and(51.39±17.19)%,and Kendall coordination coefficients being 0.429 and 0.381(P<0.001)for screening and assessment questionnaire.In the second round,the degrees of authority were 0.96±0.06 and 0.95±0.06,the average importance scores of items being 4.65±0.20 and 4.60±0.25,the coefficients of variation being(13.37±6.23)%and(14.43±6.56)%,the full score ratios being(73.83±15.03)%and(71.24±17.36)%,and Kendall coordination coefficients being 0.319 and 0.228(P<0.001)respectively.Based on the scores and expert opinions,10 items were finally selected for the screening tool and 17 items for the assessment tool.Conclusions A preliminary version of screening and assessment tool is established which consists of 10 items and 17 items respectively for malnutrition in the elderly by Delphi method.
作者 蒋倩雯 李菲卡 徐刚 白婷婷 吴方 JIANG Qian-wen;LI Fei-ka;BAI Ting-ting;WU Fang;XU Gang(Department of Geriatrics,Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200025,China;Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200025,China)
出处 《实用老年医学》 CAS 2022年第5期478-482,共5页 Practical Geriatrics
基金 国家重点研发计划(2018YFC2002101,2018YFC2002100)。
关键词 老年人 营养不良 德尔菲法 量表 aged malnutrition Delphi method tool
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献30

  • 1何夏阳,刘雪琴.老年人营养不良的相关因素及干预方法[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2007,22(5):78-81. 被引量:24
  • 2武书连 吕嘉 郭石林.中国高等教育评估[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1997,:49-73.
  • 3中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011:15-16.
  • 4黄敬亨,邢育健,吕姿之.健康教育学[M].5版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2011.
  • 5International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas[EB/OL]. [2015-12-25].http://www.diabetesatlas.org/.
  • 6PanXR, LiGW, HuYH, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study[J]. Diabetes Care, 1997, 20(4): 537-544.
  • 7TuomilehtoJ, Lindstr?mJ, ErikssonJG, et al. Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Changes in Lifestyle among Subjects with Impaired Glucose Tolerance[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001, 344(18): 1343-1350.
  • 8Lindstr?mJ, TuomilehtoJ. The Diabetes Risk Score A practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk[J]. Diabetes Care, 2003, 26(3): 725-731.
  • 9KitabchiAE, TemprosaM, KnowlerWC, et al. Role of insulin secretion and sensitivity in the evolution of type 2 diabetes in the diabetes prevention program: effects of lifestyle intervention and metformin[J]. Diabetes, 2005, 54(8): 2404-2014.
  • 10LiG, ZhangP, WangJ, et al. The long-term effect of lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes in the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 20-year follow-up study[J]. Lancent, 2008, 371(9626):1783-1789.

共引文献849

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部