利用订单系统漏洞侵财行为的罪名适用——以肯德基“薅羊毛”案为例

Application of the Crime of Taking Advantage of Loopholes in the Order System to Infringe on Property——A Case Study on the KFC“wool pulling”Case

对利用订单系统漏洞侵财行为的定性存在诈骗罪说与盗窃罪说的争论。诈骗罪说的观点有待商榷,盗窃罪说的观点也需修正。系统背后的人能够被骗只是成立诈骗罪的必要而非充分条件,欺骗行为的阙如可以直接否定诈骗罪的构成。系统通过既定的条件判断规则执行“人”的同意时,并非总能把不符合“人”的意志的财产转移行为排除出去。行为人在明知系统存在同意漏洞后,利用该漏洞实现财产转移的行为,实质上违背了被害人意志,自动交易系统就变成了行为人实施盗窃行为的工具,盗窃罪(间接正犯)的立场更能准确评价该类行为的性质。

There is a debate between the crime of fraud and the crime of theft on the qualitative behavior of taking advantage of the loopholes of the order system.The viewpoint of crime of fraud needs to be discussed.People behind the system can be cheated is only necessary but not sufficient condition to establish the crime of fraud,the absence of cheating behavior can directly negate the constitution of crime of fraud.When the system implements the abstract consent of“person”through the established conditional judgment rules,it is not always able to exclude the behavior of property transfer that does not conform to the will of“person”.The perpetrator realizes the property transfer behavior by taking advantage of the loophole of consent gap after knowing the existence of the system,which essentially violates the will of the victim.The automatic trading system becomes the tool of the perpetrator to carry out the stealing behavior.The standpoint of theft(indirect principal offense)can evaluate this kind of behavior more accurately.