摘要
由于司法部门对高空抛物罪中“情节严重”的属性存在分歧,导致高空抛物罪的认定中存在罪质不清、危险犯与结果犯混同等问题。从实质上讲,这是法益性质以及具体内涵的定位争议,其根源则在于法益一元主义定性之弊。根据行为规范和裁判规范的二分法,高空抛物罪的法益构造应具有二元立体性,即既有基础属性的社会秩序法益,又有目标属性的人身、财产及公共安全法益。在此基础上,还需进一步明晰高空抛物罪准抽象危险犯属性,建立阶层递进的适用结构,以扰乱社会秩序为形式入罪标准,以无具体法益侵害可能性和具有预测客观危险演变为抽象危险可能性为出罪路径。
The judicial departments have different opinions on the attribute of "serious circumstances" in the crime of throwing projectiles from high altitude, which leads to some problems such as unclear quality of crime, confusion between dangerous crime and result crime. Its essence lies in the positioning dispute of the nature of legal interest and its specific connotation, but the root of which lies in the disadvantages of the qualitative nature of legal interest monism. According to the dichotomy of the code of conduct and the standard of judgment, the structure of the legal interest of the aerial throwing crime should have the dual three-dimensional nature of the legal interest of social order with basic attribute and the legal interest of person, property and public safety with target attribute. On this basis, it is necessary to further clarify the attributes of the quasi-abstract danger crime of aerial projectile crime, and establish the applicable structure of hierarchical progression, with disturbing social order as the form of incrimination standard, and with no specific possibility of infringement of legal interests and with the possibility of predicting the evolution of objective danger into abstract danger as the path of incrimination.
出处
《江苏警官学院学报》
2022年第2期15-23,共9页
Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“完善党和国家监督体系研究”(21AZD088)
南京市法学会“刑法修正与知识产权刑法保护研究”(NJFX(2021)D01)。
关键词
行为规范
裁判规范
双重法益
准抽象危险犯
高空抛物罪
code of conduct
judgement norms
dual legal interests
Quasi-abstract dangerous crime
crime of intentionally throwing objects from high-rise buildings