期刊文献+

职前教师实习的三方指导模式研究——以美国密歇根州立大学小学职前教师培养项目为例 被引量:3

Study on the Tripartite Guidance Mode in Preservice Teacher Internship:Taking Elementary Teacher Preparation Program of Michigan State University as Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了培养卓越教师,帮助职前教师在实习中联结理论与实践,美国密歇根州立大学的小学职前教师培养项目形成实习学校指导教师、大学授课教师、大学实习指导教师共同参与的三方指导模式。该模式以社会文化理论作为理论基础,三方教师教育者既有明确的分工指导职责,又在指导职前教师计划、教学、评价等方面共担责任,并且三方指导模式中的两方教师教育者以合作的方式提供指导。职前教师和教师教育者都能从三方指导模式中相互学习和受益。然而,三方指导模式存在没有明确规定三方教师教育者的直接合作指导方式,可能影响职前教师整合多重身份,使得多方指导可能造成职前教师的负担过重等问题。 In order to prepare outstanding teachers and help pre-service teachers connect the theory and practice during the internship year,the elementary teacher preparation program of Michigan State University has formed a tripartite guidance mode.Informed by Social-cultural Theory,the tripartite guidance mode involves the joint participation of three sides of teacher educators,i.e.,mentor teachers,course instructors and field instructors.Teacher educators not only have their own responsibilities,but also share responsibilities of planning,teaching,and evaluation in guiding preservice teachers.In addition,any two sides of teacher educators cooperatively guide preservice teachers.The reciprocal relationship between preservice teachers and teacher educators has been developed in this mode.However,such mode has the problems,such as,it lacks clear methods of direct cooperation between tripartite teacher educators,which may lead to the adverse impact on pre-service teachers with integration of multiple identities;and multi-sides of guidance may overwhelm preservice teachers.
作者 王照萱 周钧 WANG Zhaoxuan;ZHOU Jun(Faculty of Education,University of Macao,Macao 999078;Center for Teacher Educational Research of Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期78-85,共8页 International and Comparative Education
基金 2017年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国教师教育质量保障的制度研究”(项目编号:17JJD880003)。
关键词 职前教师 实习 三方指导 教师教育 preservice teacher education internship tripartite guidance teacher education
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1The National Commission on Excellence in Education. A Nation At Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. April 1983.www. ed. gov/pubs/natatrisk.
  • 2qlae Holmes Group. Tomorrow's Teachers. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group, Inc. 1986.
  • 3Jonas F Sohis, ed. Reforming Teacher Education: The Impact of the Holmes Group Report. New York: Teachers Collge Press. 1987. P1 - 3.
  • 4S C Conley, S B Bacharach: The Holmes Group Report: Standards, Hierarchies, and Management. In: Jonas F Soltis (ed.) Reforming Teacher Fxtucation: The Impact of the Holmes Group Report. New York: Teachers Collge Press. 1987. P30- 37.
  • 5The Holmes Group. Tomorrow's Schools: Principles for the Design of Professional Development Schools. East Lansing, MI:The Holmes Group, Inc. 1990.
  • 6J A Stalling, S L Knight, D L Wiseman: Schools for Laboratory and Professional Development. In: T Husen, T N Postlethewaite. (eds), International Encyclopedia of Education. 2nd ed. Vol. 9. Oxford : Pergamon Press, 1994, P 5317.
  • 7The Holmes Group. Tomorrow's Schools of Education. East lansing, MI: qhe Holmes Group, Inc. 1995.
  • 8Joseph W Newman. America's Teachers: An Introduction to Fxtucation. 4th ed. Boston, MA: .Allyn and Bacon. 2002. P79- 82.
  • 9Joseph W Newman. America's Teachers: An Introduction to Education. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. 2002.P82.
  • 10Vygotsky ,L. S. Mirut in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 1978, P. 86.

共引文献107

同被引文献48

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部