期刊文献+

基于Monaco计划系统的最小子野面积设置值对宫颈癌调强放疗计划的影响 被引量:6

The influence of the minimum subfield area setting value based on the Monaco planning system on the intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for cervical cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究基于Monaco计划系统的最小子野面积(MSA)在宫颈癌静态调强放疗计划中的最优设置值,以提高宫颈癌放疗计划精确性。方法回顾性收集10例宫颈癌患者,使用Monaco治疗计划系统设计固定五个射野静态调强计划,MSA分别为1、2、4、10、20、50、80和100 cm^(2),每个患者得到8个放疗计划。以MSA为2 cm^(2)的放疗计划为对照组,比较其他MSA设置值的放疗计划,在其他优化目标函数和约束条件相同前提下,只改变MSA设置值,利用方差分析和事后比较的统计学方法来研究MSA对放疗计划产生的影响。结果当MSA在10~20 cm^(2)范围内,与对照组相比,靶区和危及器官的剂量变化不明显,但是机器跳数和子野数目开始下降。当MSA从50 cm^(2)开始,与对照组相比,靶区内最大剂量(D 2%)和平均剂量(D_(mean))均增加,均匀性指数(HI)和适形性指数(CI)开始变差。除了小肠平均剂量D_(mean)随MSA变化不大外,其余危及器官受量都随着MSA增大而不同程度地增加(P<0.05);机器跳数和子野数目总体随着MSA增大而减少。结论在基于Monaco治疗计划系统宫颈癌静态调强计划的设计中,MSA设置值的最佳范围为10~20 cm^(2)。 Objective To investigate the optimal setting value of the minimum segment area(MSA)based on the Monaco planning system in the static intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)plan for cervical cancer to improve the accuracy of radiotherapy planning for cervical cancer.Methods A retrospective collection of 10 patients with cervical cancer was performed using the Monaco treatment planning system to design fixed five-field static intensity modulation plans with MSA of 1,2,4,10,20,50,80,and 100 cm^(2).Each patient received eight radiotherapy plans.The radiotherapy plan with an MSA of 2 cm^(2)was used as the control group to compare the radiotherapy plans with other MSA settings.Under the premise that other optimization objective functions and constraints were the same,only the set value of MSA was changed,and the statistical methods for analyzing of variance and post-hoc comparison were used to study the impact of MSA on radiotherapy plans.Results When MSA was in the range of 10~20 cm^(2),compared with the control group,the dose of target area and organ-at-risk did not change significantly,but the number of monitor units and subfields began to decrease.When MSA starts from 50 cm^(2),compared with the control group,the maximum dose(D2%)and the average dose(D_(mean))in the target area both increased,and the uniformity index(homogeneity index,HI)and conformity index(conformity index,CI)began to deteriorate.Except for the small intestine average dose(D_(mean))that changed slightly with MSA,the exposure to other organs at risk increased with the increase of MSA(P<0.05);the number of monitor units and subfields generally decreased with the increase of MSA.Conclusion In the design of a static intensity modulation plan for cervical cancer based on a Monaco treatment planning system,the optimal setting range for the MSA setting value is 10~20 cm^(2).
作者 刘娜 张明军 吴翠娥 费振乐 刘苓苓 李兵兵 李洁 Liu Na;Zhang Mingjun;Wu Cui′e;Fei Zhenle;Liu Lingling;Li Bingbing;Li Jie(School of Biomedical Engineering,Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230032;Dept of Oncology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230601;Radiation Oncology Center,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230601;Dept of Radiotherapy,No.901 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People′s Liberation Army,Hefei 230031;Radiotherapy Center,Hefei Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hefei 230031)
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第5期811-815,共5页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基金 安徽省自然科学基金(编号:1908085MH262) 2019年度医学物理与技术安徽省重点实验室开放基金(编号:LMPT201907)。
关键词 宫颈癌 最小子野面积 调强计划 Monaco 剂量学 cervical cancer minimum subfield area intensity modulation plan Monaco dosimetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1徐英杰,符贵山,张可,宋一昕,戴建荣.西门子加速器X线束的启动特性[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(5):381-384. 被引量:7
  • 2Low DA,Gerber RL,Mutic S. Phantoms for IMRT dose distribution measurement and treatment verification[J].International Journal of Radiation Oncology,Biology,Physics,1998,(05):1231-1235.
  • 3Ezzell GA,Galvin JM,Low D. Guidance document on delivery,treatment planning,and clinical implementation of IMRT:report of the IMRT subcummittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee[J].Medical Physics,2003,(08):2089-2115.
  • 4Bortfeld T,Boyer AL,Schlegel W. Realization and verification of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with modulated fields[J].International Journal of Radiation Oncology,Biology,Physics,1994.892-908.
  • 5Bogner L,Seherer J,Treutwein M. Verification of IMRT:techniques and problems[J].Strahlenther Onkoi,2004,(06):340-350.
  • 6Yang Y,Xing L,Li JG. Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT[J].Medical Physics,2003,(11):2937-2947.
  • 7Leybovich LB,Sethi A,Dogan N. Comparison of ionization chambers of various volumes for IMRT absolute dose verification[J].Medical Physics,2003,(02):119-123.doi:10.1118/1.1536161.
  • 8Zhu J,Yin FF,Kim JH. Point dose verification for intensity modulated radiosurgery using Clarkson's method[J].Medical Physics,2003,(08):2218-2221.
  • 9Ma CM,Price RA Jr,Li JS. Monitor unit calculation for Monte Carlo treatment planning[J].Physics in Medicine and Biology,2004,(09):1671-1687.doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/9/006.
  • 10Richardson SL,Tome W A,Orton NP. IMRT delivery verification using a spiral phantom[J].Med Pbys,2003,(09):2553-2558.

共引文献535

同被引文献61

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部