期刊文献+

某超高层结构含设备层的方案比选及抗震分析 被引量:1

Mechanical Floor Design Comparison and Seismic Analysis of A Super High-Rise Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以合肥市某超高层框架-核心筒结构为例,对比分析两种设备层方案对总体结构的影响,采用PKPM及Midas Building软件进行小震下的弹性分析及大震下的弹塑性分析,并应用Abaqus软件对设备夹层剪力墙进行细部分析。计算结果表明:该框架-核心筒结构选取设备层作为单独结构层,能达到抗震性能目标确定的各项抗震性能要求,是安全、合理的。 Taking a super high-rise frame-core tube structure in Hefei as an example,the influences of two mechanical floor designs on the overall structure were compared.PKPM and Midas Building softwares were used to perform elastic analysis under small earthquake and elasto-plastic analysis under large earthquake.The Abaqus software was used to perform the detail analysis of the equipment sandwich shear wall.The calculation results show that this frame-core tube structure is safe as the mechanical floor is divided into a separate structure layer,which can achieve all seismic performance requirements of the Seismic Performance Objectives.
作者 林宝新 朱甜甜 贾鑫 LIN Baoxin;ZHU Tiantian;JIA Xin(College of Civil Engineering,Anhui Jianzhu University,Hefei 230601,China;Anhui Jianzhu University Design and Research Institute Co.Ltd.,Hefei 230022,China)
出处 《安徽建筑大学学报》 2022年第2期1-6,共6页 Journal of Anhui Jianzhu University
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0701500)。
关键词 框架-核心筒 设备夹层 罕遇地震 动力弹塑性分析 抗震性能 frame-core tube equipment sandwich rare earthquake dynamic elastic-plastic analysis seismic performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献47

共引文献460

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部