期刊文献+

风险决策研究中的仿真气球冒险任务 被引量:3

Risk-taking research based on the Balloon Analog Risk Task
下载PDF
导出
摘要 仿真气球冒险任务(TheBalloonAnalogRiskTask,BART)能在实验室环境下模拟真实世界的风险情境,具有高生态性,稳定性和可靠性等优点,已经成为风险决策研究中最常用的实验范式之一。近年来,研究者发展了多种BART变体范式,对发展、健康以及精神病理等多领域的风险决策行为及其神经基础开展了广泛探索。BART任务中的风险决策加工与腹侧纹状体、前扣带皮层、脑岛、中脑及背外侧前额叶等脑区的激活相关。未来研究需要进一步完善BART任务在风险决策认知神经领域的信效度并扩展BART的应用情境。 The Balloon Analog Risk Task(BART) can well simulate real world risk-taking situations in the laboratory environment. Due to its high ecological validity, reliability and stability, the BART paradigm has become one of the most widely used paradigms for risky decision-making research. Recently, researchers have developed multiple variants of the BART paradigm and explored risk-taking behavior and neural correlates in developmental, health, and pathological fields. Risk-taking in the BART is associated with activations in multiple brain regions including the ventral striatum, anterior cingulate cortex(ACC), insula,midbrain and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Future studies need to further improve the reliability and stability of the BART for cognitive neuroscience research and expand its application scope.
作者 邓尧 王梦梦 饶恒毅 DENG Yao;WANG Mengmeng;RAO Hengyi(School of Business and Management,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 201620,China;Key Laboratory of Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 201620,China;Center for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research&Key Laboratory of Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences,Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第6期1377-1392,共16页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71942003) 上海外国语大学校级重大项目(2021114002,2021114003)资助。
关键词 仿真气球冒险任务(BART) 风险决策 认知神经机制 The Balloon Analog Risk Task(BART) risk decision-making cognitive neural mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献83

  • 1田录梅.Rosenberg(1965)自尊量表中文版的美中不足[J].心理学探新,2006,26(2):88-91. 被引量:314
  • 2Acheson, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2007). Effects of sleep deprivation on impulsive behaviors in men and women. Physiology and Behavior, 91,579-587.
  • 3Ackert, L. F., Charupat, N., Church, B. K., & Deaves, R. (2006). An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Experimental Economics, 9, 5-16.
  • 4Aklin, W. M., Lejuez, C. W., Zvolensky, M. J., Kahler, C. W., & Gwadz, M. (2005). Evaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 215-228.
  • 5Arnett, J. J. (1996). Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Personality and Individual Difference, 20, 693-702.
  • 6Baker, M. D., Jr., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Male risk-taking as a context-sensitive signaling device. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1136-1139.
  • 7Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
  • 8Bell, D- E. (1982i. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961-981.
  • 9Benjamin, A. M., & Robbins, S. J. (2007). The role of framing effects in performance on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 221-230.
  • 10Bickel, W. K., Pitcock, J. A., Yi, R., & Angtuaco, E. J. C. (2009). Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: Fictive and real money gains and losses. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8839-8846.

共引文献54

同被引文献56

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部