《新青年》第九卷主编者问题再探--兼论“上海、广州两个编辑部并存”

Restudy on the Issue of the Editor-in-chief of Volume Nine of La Jeunesse--Also on“the coexistence of two editorial offices in Shanghai and Guangzhou”

对于《新青年》第九卷主编者问题,目前学界尚无共识。陈望道积极为《新青年》九卷一号组稿、以编辑身份为该期有关文章撰写“附记”、该期《编辑室杂记》系陈望道撰写等史实可佐证九卷一号为陈望道主编。自《新青年》九卷二号起陈望道未在该刊发表任何作品、1921年7月后鲁迅给该刊寄稿时寄稿对象为“仲甫”、陈独秀留下编辑该刊的痕迹等史实可证明九卷二号至六号系陈独秀主编。胡适对陈望道不满、陈望道与陈独秀不和及新青年社南迁都促使陈望道在编完九卷一号后退出《新青年》。《新青年》没出现过“上海、广州两个编辑部并存”的情况。

There is currently no consensus in the academic circles on the issue of the editor-in-chief of the ninth volume of La Jeunesse.Chen Wangdao actively solicited contributions for No.1,Volume 9 of the La Jeunesse.As an editor,he wrote“supplementary notes”for the relevant articles and Editorial Miscellaneous Notes of this issue.Such historical facts can prove that Chen Wangdao was the editor-in-chief of No.1,Volume 9.Chen Wangdao had not published any articles in the journal since the second issue of Volume 9 of La Jeunesse.After July 1921 when Lu Xun sent his manuscripts to the journal,the object to whom he sent his article was“Zhong Fu”,and Chen Duxiu also left the vestige to have edited the journal.These historical facts can explain that Chen Duxiu was the editor-in-chief from No.2 to No.6 of Volume 9.Hu Shi’s dissatisfaction with Chen Wangdao,the feud between Chen Wangdao and Chen Duxiu,and the southward movement of the La Jeunesse Club all prompted Chen Wangdao to withdraw from La Jeunesse after editing No.1 of the ninth volume.So La Jeunesse has never seen“the coexistence of two editorial offices in Shanghai and Guangzhou”.