期刊文献+

基于引文重要性的知识流动主路径分析 被引量:8

Tracing the Knowledge Flow Main Path Based on Important Citations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统基于引文网络的主路径分析方法没有考虑引文对施引文献的相对价值,认为一篇学术文献的所有引文对该文献具有同等程度的知识贡献。本文从引用行为的统计学层面和语义信息层面综合区分引文重要性,探讨引文对施引文献的重要性对构造主路径的影响。构建了引文重要度指标对主路径分析方法中的链接遍历计数进行调节,并通过实例验证了改进后的主路径分析方法在提取知识流方面的性能。实验结果显示,经过引文重要度加权调节后的关键主路径和全局主路径取得了实验中最高的精确值和F1值。研究结果表明,通过引文重要度加权调节可以增加主路径链接在时间上的连续性,提高节点间的相关性,提升主路径分析方法找到关键节点的能力和链接溯源能力。 The traditional main path method based on citation network analysis does not consider the knowledge contribution of the cited literature to citations.It is considered that all citations of an academic document are of equal importance to the document,even though there can be various reasons and different levels of importance from one document to another.This paper applied main path analysis,taking different important citation levels into consideration,and constructed a citation importance index as a reference variable for adjusting traversal counts.The experimental results showed that the key main path and global main path after weighted adjustment of citation importance achieved the highest Precision and F1scores in this experiment.This research proves that the weighted adjustment with citation importance can increase the continuity of the main path link in time,improving the correlation between nodes.This improves the traceability of the main path analysis method and the ability to find key nodes.
作者 夏红玉 胡潜 王忠义 Xia Hongyu;Hu Qian;Wang Zhongyi(School of Information Management,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079)
出处 《情报学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第5期451-462,共12页 Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代我国文献信息资源保障体系重构研究”(19ZDA345) 国家社会科学基金项目“‘互联网+’背景下面向产业链的行业信息服务融合研究”(16BTQ063)。
关键词 引文分析 知识流动 主路径分析 引文重要性 citation analysis knowledge flow main path analysis important citations
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献225

  • 1叶继元.引文法既是定量又是定性的评价法[J].图书馆,2005(1):43-45. 被引量:46
  • 2何荣利.作者引文活动管窥[J].中国科技期刊研究,1995,6(1):54-55. 被引量:8
  • 3阎光才.学术认可与学术系统内部的运行规则[J].高等教育研究,2007,28(4):21-28. 被引量:27
  • 4J·科尔、S·科尔.《科学界的社会分层》,赵佳苓、顾昕、黄绍林译,北京:华夏出版社,1989年,第27页.
  • 5Garfield E. Citation index for science [ J] Science, 1955, 122 (3159) : 108 -111.
  • 6Herlach G. Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article [ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1978, 29 (6) : 308 - 310.
  • 7Small H G. Cited documents as concept symbols [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 1978, 8(3) : 327 -340.
  • 8Mccain K, Turner K. Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics [ J ]. Scientometrics, 1989, 17(1 -2) : 127 -163.
  • 9Small H. Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87 (2) : 373 - 388.
  • 10Teufel S, Siddharthan A, Tidhar D. Automatic classification of citation function [ C ]//Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg:Association for Computational Linguistics ,2006 : 103 - 110.

共引文献204

同被引文献103

引证文献8

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部