期刊文献+

考虑偏差值的中立型区间交叉效率研究 被引量:1

A Neutral Interval Cross-efficiency Method Based on Deviation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在不确定性环境下,当决策单元(DMU)的投入产出数据为区间数形式时,为解决决策单元之间既不是合作也不是竞争关系时的交叉评价问题,本文提出一种中立型区间交叉效率模型。从所有被评价者的角度出发解决评价权重的选取问题,以决策单元投入得分的平均偏差与产出得分的平均偏差之和最小化为目标,建立决策单元在最佳和最差两种生产状态下的中立型区间交叉效率模型。在本文提出的中立型模型视角下,DMU的投入得分平均偏差和产出得分平均偏差之和达到最小。算例结果表明该中立型区间交叉效率模型的有效性,解决了不确定性环境下的交叉评价问题,保证评价的客观公正,更加符合现实。 In uncertain environments,the input and output values of DMUs are interval numbers.In order to solve the cross-evaluation problem of decision-making-units(DMUs)that is neither cooperative nor competitive,by taking the minimum sum of the average deviations forinput scores and output scores as the goal,two neutral models are constructed for evaluating DMUs under the best and worst production conditions.From the perspective of the proposed neutral models,the sum of the average deviations for input scores and output scores of the DMUs reaches the minimum.The research results show the effectiveness of the neutral interval cross efficiency models and solve the problem of neutral evaluation in uncertain environments,which can ensure the objectivity of evaluation and make the evaluation results more credible and realistic.
作者 尤翠玲 黄衍 黄嘉文 张杰豪 温永仙 YOU Cui-ling;HUANG Yan;HUANG Jia-wen;ZHANG Jie-hao;WEN Yong-xian(College of Computer and Information Sciences,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China)
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第5期81-85,共5页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2017J01606) 福建农林大学科技创新基金资助项目(CXZX2019127G)。
关键词 数据包络分析 区间数 偏差值 中立型 data envelopment analysis interval number deviation neutral secondary goal
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1彭育威,吴守宪,徐小湛.利用MATLAB进行DEA交叉评价分析[J].西南民族大学学报(自然科学版),2004,30(5):553-556. 被引量:83
  • 2梁樑,吴杰.区间DEA的一种改进的充分排序方法[J].系统工程,2006,24(1):107-110. 被引量:25
  • 3吴杰,梁樑.交叉效率评价方法中新单元导入的保序性[J].系统工程,2006,24(7):111-115. 被引量:16
  • 4Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of deeision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2 (6) : 429- 444.
  • 5Zilla S S, Lea F. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140 (2) :249- 256.
  • 6Sexton T R, Silkman R H, Hogan A J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions[C]//Silkman R H ( Ed. ), Measuring efficiency : An assessment of data envelopment analysis, Jossey-Bass , San Francisco, 1986.
  • 7Doyle J R, Green R H. Cross Evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUs[J]. INFOR, 1995, 33 (3):205 - 222.
  • 8Doyle J R, Green R H. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45 (5) :567 - 578.
  • 9Doyle J, Green R, Cook W D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross evaluation[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 90 (3): 461-472.
  • 10Norio Hibiki. Evaluation techniques with a modified cross efficiency in DEA[J]. Journal of the Operations Research Society in Japan, 1998, 41(2):229-245.

共引文献38

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部