期刊文献+

乳腺癌化学治疗致肝损伤预测模型的构建及其评价 被引量:5

Construction and evaluation of a prediction model for liver injury induced by chemotherapy for breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的·分析乳腺癌化学治疗(化疗)致肝损伤的危险因素,构建乳腺癌化疗致肝损伤的预测模型并对其进行评价。方法·以2019年4月至2021年9月在南昌大学第二附属医院接受蒽环类联合环磷酰胺序贯紫杉醇类±曲妥珠单抗化疗方案的乳腺癌患者为研究对象,分为肝损伤组与未损伤组。采用χ^(2)检验及二元Logistic回归分析化疗致肝损伤的危险因素并建立预测模型。采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评价回归模型的预测效能并对其进行外部验证。结果·入选符合纳入标准的乳腺癌患者207例。其中,肝损伤组患者69例(33.3%),未损伤组138例。2组间的化疗方案(χ^(2)=44.851,P=0.000)、感染乙肝病毒(χ^(2)=16.682,P=0.000)、既往高血压病史(χ^(2)=13.211,P=0.004)、肿瘤TNM分期(χ^(2)=14.422,P=0.001)、既往糖尿病史(χ^(2)=4.839,P=0.028)、化疗前白蛋白水平低下(χ^(2)=10.073,P=0.002)以及三酰甘油升高(χ^(2)=39.367,P=0.000)的差异存在统计学意义。二元Logistic回归分析显示,化疗方案(OR=4.734,95%CI为1.687~13.283,P=0.003)、感染乙肝病毒(OR=4.530,95%CI为1.806~11.366,P=0.001)、肿瘤TNM分期Ⅲ期(OR=5.304,95%CI为1.802~15.608,P=0.002)、既往糖尿病史(OR=3.041,95%CI为1.196~7.729,P=0.019)以及化疗前白蛋白水平低下(OR=3.744,95%CI为1.413~9.920,P=0.008)是化疗致肝损伤的独立危险因素。Logistic回归模型:logit(P)=-3.471+1.511·X1+1.112·X2+1.320·X3+0.755·X4+0.691·X5+0.973·X6+1.258·X7+0.741·X8+1.668·X9+1.555·X10。ROC曲线下面积为0.874,标准误0.024,95%CI为0.827~0.922,P=0.000。外部验证显示,预测模型特异度为86.9%,灵敏度76.9%;阳性预测值为71.4%,阴性预测值为89.8%;准确度为83.9%;Kappa值为0.624,标准误为0.091,P=0.000。结论·此Logistic回归模型具有较高的预测效能,对预测患者是否出现肝损伤有一定的参考价值。 Objective·To analyze the risk factors of liver injury induced by chemotherapy for breast cancer,and to construct and evaluate a prediction model of liver injury induced by chemotherapy.Methods·Breast cancer patients hospitalized at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from April 2019 to September 2021 who received anthracycline combined with cyclophosphamide sequential paclitaxel±trastuzumab chemotherapy were enrolled in the study,and were divided into liver injury group and non-injury group.The risk factors of liver injury induced by chemotherapy were analyzed byχ^(2)test and binary Logistic regression,and the prediction model was established.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the regression model,and then the predictive model was externally validated.Results·Two hundred and seven patients with breast cancer met the inclusion criteria in this study,and sixty-nine patients with liver injury(33.3%).Univariate analysis showed that the difference of chemotherapy regimen(χ^(2)=44.851,P=0.000),hepatitis B virus infection(χ^(2)=16.682,P=0.000),previous history of hypertension(χ^(2)=13.211,P=0.004),tumor TNM staging(χ^(2)=14.422,P=0.001),previous history of diabetes(χ^(2)=4.839,P=0.028),low albumin level before chemotherapy(χ^(2)=10.073,P=0.002)and elevated triacylglycerol(χ^(2)=39.367,P=0.000)were statistically significant between the two groups.Binary Logistic regression showed that chemotherapy regimen(OR=4.734,95%CI 1.687-13.283,P=0.003),hepatitis B virus infection(OR=4.530,95%CI 1.806-11.366,P=0.001),tumor TNM stageⅢ(OR=5.304,95%CI 1.802-15.608,P=0.002),previous history of diabetes(OR=3.041,95%CI 1.196-7.729,P=0.019),and low albumin level before chemotherapy(OR=3.744,95%CI 1.413-9.920,P=0.008)were independent risk factors for liver injury caused by chemotherapy.logit(P)=-3.471+1.511·X1+1.112·X2+1.320·X3+0.755·X4+0.691·X5+0.973·X6+1.258·X7+0.741·X8+1.668·X9+1.555·X10.The area under the ROC curve was 0.874,the standard error was 0.024,95%CI 0.827-0.922,P=0.000.External validation showed that the specificity of the prediction model was 86.9%,the sensitivity was 76.9%;the positive predictive value was 71.4%,the negative predictive value was 89.8%;the accuracy was 83.9%;the Kappa value was 0.624,the standard error was 0.091,P=0.000.Conclusion·This Logistic regression model has high predictive performance and has certain reference value for breast doctors to predict whether patients have liver damage.
作者 夏坤健 邓林林 王琳 XIA Kunjian;DENG Linlin;WANG Lin(Department of Breast Surgery,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330006,China;Department of Critical Care Medicine,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330006,China)
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第4期502-509,共8页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
关键词 乳腺癌 肝损伤 预测模型 ROC曲线 Kappa一致性检验 breast cancer liver injury predictive model ROC curve Kappa consistency test
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献72

  • 1中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2011版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2011,21(5):367-417. 被引量:268
  • 2Danan G, Benichou C. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs-I. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: application to drug-induced liver injuries. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993, 46: 1323-1330.
  • 3Benichou C. Criteria of drug-induced liver disorders. Report of an international consensus meeting. J Hepatol, 1990, 11: 272-276.
  • 4Fontana RJ, Seeff LB, Andrade RJ, et al. Standardization of nomenclature and causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury: summary of a clinical research workshop. Hepatology, 2010, 52: 730-742.
  • 5Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol, 1995, 22: 696-699.
  • 6Kleiner DE. The pathology of drug-induced liver injury. Semin Liver Dis, 2009, 29: 364-372.
  • 7Li MK, Crawford JM. The pathology of cholestasis. Semin Liver Dis, 2004, 24: 21-42.
  • 8Velayudham LS, Farrell GC. Drug induced cholestasis. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2003, 2: 287-304.
  • 9Suzuki A, Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, et al. The use of liver biopsy evaluation in discrimination of idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis versus drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology, 2011, 54:931-939.
  • 10Bjornsson ES, Bergmann OM, Bjomsson HK, et al. Incidence, presentation, and outcomes in patients with drug-induced liver injury in the general population of Iceland[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 144(7): 1419-1425.

共引文献1801

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部