摘要
目的对全口义齿修复的两种方案(传统修复方法,生物功能性修复方法)临床应用效果进行探讨分析。方法于该院在2018年3月—2020年12月期间随机选取60例接受全口义齿修复术的患者进行回顾性分析;依据其治疗性质的不同进行随机分为两组。对照组30例,实施传统修复方式治疗;观察组30例,实施生物功能性修复方法治疗。对比观察两组患者的治疗有效率、口腔健康程度、义齿压痛点个数与患者舒适度评分以及治疗满意度。结果观察组患者治疗有效率为96.67%,高于对照组的73.33%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.706,P<0.05)。观察组牙槽嵴高度、牙槽骨骨吸收情况分别为(-3.04±0.37)、(0.50±0.11)mm,低于对照组的(-2.26±0.28)、(0.64±0.12)mm,而咀嚼效率、咀嚼物吸光度值分别为(84.95±9.32)%、(0.48±0.04),均高于对照组的(72.46±10.51)%、(0.42±0.05),差异有统计学意义(t=9.207、4.710、4.870、5.132,P<0.05)。观察组术后义齿压痛点个数显著于对照组,术后舒适度评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗满意度为93.33%,高于对照组的73.33%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.320,P<0.05)。结论在全口义齿修复中,实施生物功能性修复方法治疗对比传统修复方法效果更为理想,能够有效促进患者预后口腔健康程度的提升,并减少其术后义齿压痛点,提升患者满意度及舒适度。
Objective To discuss and analyze the clinical application effects of two methods of complete denture restoration(traditional restoration methods and biological functional restoration methods).Methods From March 2018 to December 2020,60 patients who underwent complete denture repair were randomly selected and analyzed retrospectively.According to the nature of treatment,they were randomly divided into two groups.two groups.30 cases in the control group were treated with traditional repair methods,and 30 cases in the observation group were treated with biological functional repair methods.Compared and observed the treatment efficiency,oral health,denture tenderness,patient comfort score,and treatment satisfaction of the two groups of patients.Results The effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 96.67%,which was higher than 73.33%in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=4.706,P<0.05).The alveolar ridge height and alveolar bone resorption of the observation group were(-3.04±0.37)mm,(0.50±0.11)mm,respectively,which were lower than those of the control group(-2.26±0.28)mm,(0.64±0.12)mm.The mastication efficiency and the absorbance of the chew were(84.95±9.32)%and(0.48±0.04),respectively,which were higher than those of the control group(72.46±10.51)%and(0.42±0.05),the difference was statistically significant(t=9.207,4.710,4.870,5.132,P<0.05).The number of postoperative denture tenderness points in the observation group was significantly less than that of the control group,and the postoperative comfort score was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The observation group of patient satisfaction rate was 93.33%,which was higher than 73.33%of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=4.320,P<0.05).Conclusion In the restoration of complete dentures,the effect of biological functional restoration methods is more ideal than traditional restoration methods.It can effectively promote the prognosis of patients'oral health,reduce the tenderness of their dentures after surgery,and improve patient satisfaction and comfort.
作者
殷宪雷
YIN Xianlei(Department of Stomatology,Third Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University,Xuzhou,Jiangsu Province,221003 China)
出处
《中外医疗》
2022年第6期66-69,共4页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
全口义齿修复
传统修复法
生物功能性修复法
咀嚼功能
Complete denture restoration
Traditional restoration method
Biological functional restoration method
Chewing function