期刊文献+

河南省驻马店市基层医疗机构医生慢性阻塞性肺疾病知识掌握情况及影响因素调查研究 被引量:4

Knowledge levels of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among physicians in primary care and related factors:a survey in Zhumadian City of Henan Province
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解基层医疗机构医生慢性阻塞性肺疾病(慢阻肺)相关知识的掌握情况及其影响因素,为探索基层医疗机构慢阻肺预防诊治能力提升方法提供依据。方法2020年12月1—31日,在河南省驻马店市761家基层医疗机构中每家随机选取1~3名拟参与慢阻肺高危筛查项目的医生,共1232名,对其基本信息和对慢阻肺相关知识掌握情况进行问卷调查。问卷内容包括基本信息、慢阻肺的危险因素及急性加重常见原因、症状及诊断、治疗及管理相关内容。根据调查对象的学历将其分为本科及以上、大专、中专及以下3组,比较3组对象对慢阻肺相关知识认知的差异,用logistic回归模型分析其影响因素。结果共回收问卷1232份,回收率100.0%,有效问卷1221份,有效率99.1%,最终纳入分析1221份。基层医生的学历与慢阻肺相关认知水平间存在线性关系(χ^(2)=9.91,P<0.05),认知水平随着学历的升高而升高(r=0.09,P<0.05)。慢阻肺患者危险因素及急性加重常见原因、治疗管理认知方面,基层医生的学历与其认知水平间存在线性关系(χ^(2)=13.86,20.93,均P<0.001),且认知水平随着学历的升高而升高(r=0.11,0.13,均P<0.001)。症状及诊断认知方面,学历与其认知水平间不存在相关性(χ^(2)=1.90,P=0.168)。Logistic回归分析显示,慢阻肺认知程度方面,31~40岁基层医生较20~30岁者更高(OR=2.24,95%CI:1.16~4.30,P=0.016);本科及以上学历基层医生较中专及以下学历者更高(OR=1.71,95%CI:1.24~2.37,P=0.001);初级、中级职称基层医生较无职称者更高(OR=1.65,95%CI:1.28~2.13,P<0.001;OR=2.15,95%CI:1.46~3.16,P<0.001);参加培训次数≥3次的基层医生较培训次数<3次者更高(OR=1.15,95%CI:1.21~2.61,P=0.021)。结论基层医生对慢阻肺相关知识的认知受年龄、学历、职称、参加培训次数影响,尤其在慢阻肺患者危险因素及急性加重常见原因、治疗管理认知方面。 Objective To survey the knowledge levels of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)among physicians in primary care and related factors.Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted during December 2020 to December 2021 among 1232 primary care doctors in Zhumadian City of Henan Province.The questionnaire included basic information,knowledge of COPD and its management,and the training received.The COPD-related knowledge levels and the influencing factors were analyzed using logistic regression model.Results A total of 1232 questionnaires were collected,and 1221(99.1%)were valid,which were included in the analysis.The survey showed that the COPD-related knowledge level was significantly associated with the educational level of primary care physicians(χ^(2)=9.91,P<0.05);and the Pearson correlation analysis showed that the knowledge level was positively correlated with educational level(r=0.09,P<0.05).In terms of risk factors,causes of acute exacerbations,and treatment and management of COPD,there was a linear relationship between the education level and knowledge level(χ^(2)=13.86,P<0.001;χ^(2)=20.93,P<0.001);the Pearson correlation analysis showed that the knowledge level was correlated with higher educational level(r=0.11,P<0.001;r=0.13,P<0.001).In terms of symptoms and diagnosis,there was no correlation between educational level and awareness level(χ^(2)=1.90,P=0.168).Logistic regression model showed that compared to doctors aged 20-30,those aged 31-40 had a higher COPD-related knowledge level(OR=2.24,95%CI:1.16-4.30,P=0.016);compare to the doctors with associate degree,doctors with bachelor degree or above had a higher COPD-related knowledge(OR=1.71,95%CI:1.24-2.37,P=0.001);compared to doctors without professional title,those with primary or middle-rank professional title had a higher knowledge level(OR=1.65,95%CI:1.28-2.13,P<0.001;OR=2.15,95%CI:1.46-3.16,P<0.001);compared to doctors with training time<3,those with training time≥3 had a higher knowledge level(OR=1.15,95%CI:1.21-2.61,P=0.021).Conclusion The COPD-related knowledge levels(especially in knowledge of risk factors and causes of acute exacerbations,and treatment and management of COPD)among doctors in primary care are affected by age,educational background,professional title,and the number of training sessions.
作者 唐星瑶 黄可 李薇 贾存波 杨汀 Tang Xingyao;Huang Ke;Li Wei;Jia Cunbo;Yang Ting(China-Japan Friendship Clinical Medical College,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine,Center of Respiratory Medicine,China-Japan Friendship Hospital National Center for Respiratory Medicine,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2022年第5期422-429,共8页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
基金 中国医学科学院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(2019TX320005) 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程项目(2021-I2M-1-049)。
关键词 肺疾病 慢性阻塞性 认知 问卷调查 初级保健 Pulmonary disease,chronic obstructive Cognition Questionnaires Primary care
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献69

共引文献3374

同被引文献78

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部