期刊文献+

后疫情时代新业态从业者劳动权益保障的困境与化解 被引量:2

The dilemma and solution of the protection of labor rights and interests of workers in new forms of business in the post-epidemic era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 后疫情时代,国家鼓励支持新业态新模式的发展。但新业态从业者劳动权益保障面临诸多问题和困境:一是新业态从业者劳动权益保障的法律法规不健全,二是新业态从业者利用现有法律法规保障自身权益难度较大,三是新业态从业者劳动权益保障机制缺失。可以从加快制定和完善适用于新业态从业者劳动权益保障的法律法规、借助指导性案例明晰新业态从业者与用工单位之间劳动关系的认定、逐步构建新业态从业者劳动权益保障的多方机制等方面,化解新业态从业者劳动权益保护难题,营造新业态从业者劳动权益保障的法治环境,助推新业态新经济模式发展和人民群众追求更加美好的生活。 In the post-epidemic era,the state encourages and supports the development of new forms and models of business.However,the protection of labor rights and interests of new business practitioners faces many problems and difficulties.First,the laws and regulations on the protection of labor rights and interests of workers in new forms of business are not sound.Second,it is difficult for practitioners of new forms of business to protect their own rights and interests by using existing laws and regulations.Third,there is no mechanism to protect the labor rights and interests in new forms of business.So by accelerating the formulation and improvement of laws and regulations applicable to the protection of labor rights and interests of workers in new forms of business,clarifying the identification of labor relations between practitioners of new business forms and employers with guiding cases,and gradually establishing a multi-party mechanism for protecting the labor rights and interests of workers in new forms of business,we can resolve the difficulties in protecting the labor rights and interests of workers in new forms of business,create a legal environment for the protection of the labor rights and interests of workers in new forms of business,and boost the development of new forms of business and new economic models and the people’s pursuit of a better life.
作者 赵玉增 赵为东 ZHAO Yu-zeng;ZHAO Wei-dong(School of Law,Qingdao University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266061,China)
出处 《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第1期85-92,共8页 Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 青岛市社科规划项目(QDSKL2001274)。
关键词 后疫情时代 新业态 新业态从业者 劳动权益保障 post-epidemic ear new forms of business practitioners of new forms of business protection of labor rights and interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献92

  • 1吕琳.论“劳动者”主体界定之标准[J].法商研究,2005,22(3):30-36. 被引量:57
  • 2郑尚元.雇佣关系调整的法律分界——民法与劳动法调整雇佣类合同关系的制度与理念[J].中国法学,2005(3):80-89. 被引量:76
  • 3[德]雷蒙德·瓦尔特曼.《德国劳动法》,沈建峰,译,法律出版社,2014年版,第46页.
  • 4See Daniel Rauch and David Schleicher, Like Uber, But for Local Government Policy: The Future of Local Regulation of the "Shared Economy", http://marroninstitute.nyu.edu/uploads/content/The_Future of Local_Regulation of the Shared_Economy.pdf, last visit on March 21,2015.
  • 5See Douglas O'Connor, et al., v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC., Docket No. 251 (2015).
  • 6See Douglas O'Connor, et al., v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC., Docket No. 357 (2015).
  • 7See Dan Levine, Uber Drivers' Labor Lawsuit Granted Class Action Status in California, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ uber-drivers-labor-lawsuit-granted-class-action-status-in-california us 55e60a54e4b0b7a9633aa657, last visit on March 18, 2015.
  • 8See Naravan v. EGL, Inc., 616 F. 3d 901 (9th Cir. 2010).
  • 9See Yellow Cab Coop. Inc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., 226 Cal. App. 3d 1288 (1991).
  • 10See S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dep' t of Indus. Relations, 48 Cal. 3d 357 (1989).

共引文献454

同被引文献67

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部