期刊文献+

基于木蜂筑巢习性的古建筑木构件木蜂危害等级划分 被引量:2

Evaluation of Damage Grades for Wooden Components of Ancient Buildings Based on Nesting Habits of Carpenter Bee
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】基于木蜂筑巢习性,划分古建筑木构件木蜂危害等级,为古建筑保护工程勘察提供参考依据和评定标准。【方法】收集受木蜂危害的轻木构件,采用内窥镜、CT扫描和巢穴解剖方式,了解巢穴构造,计算隧道容积和巢穴体积,估算木材损失程度,结合古建筑木构件危害勘察,划分木蜂危害等级。【结果】经鉴定,收集到的木蜂为黄胸木蜂。内窥镜可以观测到主隧道,隧道有2~3条分枝,次隧道与主隧道夹角成一定角度,影响内窥镜进一步深入观测。CT扫描能够准确了解巢穴内部危害。巢穴解剖发现,黄胸木蜂巢穴皆为分枝型,大部分为双向平行2条分枝或一侧2条分枝另一侧1条分枝;巢室内径平均1.55 cm,每条分枝长度平均14.4 cm,隧道容积平均约133.67 cm^(3),巢穴体积平均1436.58 cm^(3)。【结论】古建筑木蜂危害一般发生在建筑外部的檐椽、望板、斗栱等非承重和非独立作用构件上,基于木蜂筑巢习性估算木材损失程度,古建筑木构件木蜂危害可划分为1~4级:当木构件有且仅有1个木蜂孔洞时,为1级危害;当木构件有2~3个木蜂孔洞时,为2级危害;当木构件有4~5个木蜂孔洞时,为3级危害;当木构件有6个及以上木蜂孔洞时,为4级危害。 【Objective】Carpenter bees nesting on wooden components of ancient buildings brings damage to wooden structures.This study evaluated the carpenter bees damage grade for wooden components in order to provide a basis and an evaluation standard for the investigation and maintenance design of ancient building protection engineering.【Method】Balsa woods damaged by carpenter bees were collected,then inspected nest structure by endoscopy and CT.Then the wood was cut through to observe the nest cell structure.Damage degree of wood structures was converted by tunnels volume and nest size.【Result】The carpenter bee collected in this study was identified as Xylocopa(Koptortosoma)appendiculata.The endoscope could observe the main tunnel,and it could be found that the tunnel had 2-3 branches.CT scanning could provide an accurate understanding of nest structure.By dissecting the nests,it was found that the most nests of X.appendiculata were two parallel tunnels in two sides perpendicular to the entrance hole or two tunnels on one side and one on the other side.The average internal diameter of the tunnel was 1.55 cm,and the average length was 14.4 cm.The average of tunnels volume of each nest was 133.67 cm^(3).and the average of nest volumes was estimated at 1436.58 cm^(3).【Conclusion】The damage of carpenter bees in ancient buildings generally occured on the non load-bearing and independent wood components such as rafters,roof boarding or brackets.In order to estimate the degree of damage,this study evaluated the carpenter bee damage grade as 1-4 rate based on nesting habits:the wood component is found only one hole,it is classified as class 1 damage;when 2-3 holes are found,it is classified as class 2 damage;when 4-5 holes are found,it is classified as grade 3 damage;when more than 6 holes are found,it is classified as class 4 damage.
作者 马星霞 王麟 乔云飞 段恩泽 路易 方旋 张斌 王艳华 金琪军 Ma Xingxia;Wang Lin;Qiao Yunfei;Duan Enze;Lu Yi;Fang Xuan;Zhang Bin;Wang Yanhua;Jin Qijun(Research Institute of Wood Industry,CAF,Beijing 100091;Ningbo Municipal Institute of Cultural Heritage Management,Ningbo 315000;Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage,Beijing 100029;Shanxi Academy of Ancient Building and Painted Sculpture&Fresco Preservation,Taiyuan 030012;China Foundation For Cultural Heritage Conservation,Beijing 100007;Ningbo Yinzhou Cultural Relics Protection and Management Center,Ningbo 315000)
出处 《林业科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第3期167-174,共8页 Scientia Silvae Sinicae
基金 中央公益性科研院所基金重点项目(CAFYBB2019ZB008) 国家文物局文物保护行业标准制定项目(WW2020-004-T) 国家自然科学基金项目(31971588)。
关键词 木结构古建筑 木蜂危害 筑巢特性 危害等级评定 病害勘察 wooden structure of ancient buildings carpenter bee hazard nesting habits damage rating disease survey
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献54

  • 1罗禄怡.贵州蜜蜂种类调查及评述[J].贵州农学院学报,1993,12(1):98-104. 被引量:1
  • 2陈允适,刘秀英,李华,黄荣凤.古建筑木结构的保护问题[J].故宫博物院院刊,2005(5):332-343. 被引量:22
  • 3朱益民.木材无损检测的现状及展望[J].云南林业科技,1996(1):82-84. 被引量:7
  • 4姜双林,李博平.陇东地区不同生境下蜜蜂的种类及其生态分布[J].草业科学,2007,24(5):89-91. 被引量:2
  • 5高橋和彦,桵井正明,渡部扶三男.2003.超音波信播速度にょる木材の劣化度和の推定.平成14年度木製治山施設設計指針策定調查委托報告(財団法人林業土木),5-8.
  • 6山下香菜,岡田直紀,藤原健.2007.ピロデイを用いた容積密度推定法とスキ生材丸太のクラス分けへの応用.木材学会誌,53(2):72-81.
  • 7Emerson R, Pollock D, McLean D, et al. 2002. Ultrasonic inspection of large bridge timbers. Forest Products Journal, 52 (9) : 88 -95.
  • 8Wang T, Aitken S N, Rozenberg P, et al. 1999. Selection for height growth and pilodyn pin penetration in lodgepole pine: effects on growth traits wood properties and their relationships. Canadian Jouma~ of Forest Research, 29 (4) : 434 -445.
  • 9Wang X, Ross R J, Mattson J A, et al. 2002. Nondestructive evaluation techniques for assessing modulus of elasticity and stiffness of small- diameter logs. Forest Products Journal, 52 (2) : 79 - 85.
  • 10祖父江信夫.木材的无损检测.木材学会志,1993,39(9):973-979.

共引文献76

同被引文献72

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部