期刊文献+

An attempt to find a suitable place for soil moisture sensor in a drip irrigation system

原文传递
导出
摘要 Determination of an appropriate location for monitoring soil water content (SWC) is a keyfactor in efficient use of water in precision agriculture, however, the main challenge is thedynamic movement of water and root development in the soil profile. The objective of thisstudy was investigating how SWC distribution in a loam soil profile at two growth stages ofmaize may impact the suitable location for SWC monitoring in a drip-tape irrigation system.A new concept, Average Moisture Representative Surface (AMRS) was proposed to determine the surface of the soil profile, which represent the average soil moisture of the wettedvolume. SWC samples were taken during two irrigation intervals (48~52 days after planting(DAP) and 68~73 DAP) and root growth pattern was studied through root length density (RLD)at 50 and 100 DAP. The results revealed that a non-uniform wetting pattern after irrigationlimits the appropriate locations for SWC monitoring to point measurements and with time,SWC depletion resulted in enlarging AMRS. At the end of growing season, an increase of rootgrowth around the drippers increased the variation of root water uptake in different soil layers, and thus optimal place for soil sensors was limited to the upper layers, where the maximum root water uptake occurred. Overall, it is recommended to install soil sensors, such astensiometers and TDRs at a horizontal distance of 5~20 cm from the crop and a depth of10~20 cm from the soil surface while drip-tape is aligned close to the maize row.
出处 《Information Processing in Agriculture》 EI 2022年第2期254-265,共12页 农业信息处理(英文)
基金 Funding for this study was provided by Isfahan University of Technology and Iran National Science Foundation(INSF)(project No.97010962).
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1张楠,郭迅华,陈国青.信息技术初期接受扩展模型及其实证研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(9):123-130. 被引量:52
  • 2Adeoye K B. 1986. Physical changes induced by rainfall in the surface layer of an Alfisol, northern Nigeria. Geoderma, 39, 59-66.
  • 3Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, Smith M 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56.
  • 4United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Bai W M, Li L H. 2003. Effect of irrigation methods and quota on root water uptake and biomass of alfalfa in the Wulanbuhe sandy region of China. Agricultural Water Management, 62, 139--148.
  • 5Bathke G R, Cassel D K, Hargrove W L, Porter P M. 1992. Modification of soil physical properties and root growth response. Soil Science, 154, 316-329.
  • 6Benjamin J G, Nielsen D C. 2006. Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crops Reseach, 97,248-253.
  • 7Breazeale L E, Mcgeorge W T. 1953. Influence of atmospheric humidity on root growth. Soil Science, 76, 361-366.
  • 8Cavero J, Medina E T, Pug M, Martinez-Cob A. 2009. Sprinkler irrigation changes maize canopy microclimate and crop water status, transpiration, and temperature. Agronomy Journal. 101. 854-864.
  • 9Fabi,o A, Madeira M, Steen E, Ktterer 3", Ribeiro C, Arajo C. 1995. Development of root biomass in an Eucalyptus globulus plantation under different water and nutrient regimes. Plant and Soft, 188-169, 215-223.
  • 10Ferguson H, Boatwright G O. 1968. Effects of environmental factors on the development of the crown node and adventitious roots of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Agronomy Journal, 60,258-260.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部