期刊文献+

中国间接税的效率损失——基于中国生产网络结构一般均衡模型方法 被引量:11

Efficiency Loss of Indirect Tax in China: Based on the General Equilibrium Model of China’s Production Network Structure
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文构建了嵌入间接税的中国投入产出网络结构一般均衡模型,并创新性地提出间接税效率损失的事后测算方法。基于此,本文利用1992~2017年的中国投入产出表和税收等数据编制了与模型匹配的社会核算矩阵,并进一步进行了实证测算分析。研究表明:(1)总体上,考虑到生产网络结构、微观替代弹性系数和间接税处理方式的影响,中国间接税效率损失率约为0.5%~10%。(2)生产网络结构越复杂,微观替代弹性系数越大,间接税的效率损失率就越大。(3)生产网络二阶近似新方法测算的间接税效率损失率远大于经典哈伯格方法。(4)1992~2017年期间,中国间接税效率损失率呈阶段性特点。1992~2007年,伴随着分税制改革完成和加入WTO后深度融入全球价值链,中国间接税效率损失率总体上呈下降趋势。2007~2017年期间,中国间接税效率损失率受金融危机的影响先上升,后受减税降费等政策影响而保持平稳或略有下降。 This paper constructs a general equilibrium model of China’s input-output network structure embedded with indirect tax, and innovatively puts forward the post calculation method of indirect tax efficiency loss. Based on this, this paper uses China’s input-output table and tax data from 1992 to 2017 to compile a social accounting matrix matching the model, and further empirically calculates and analyzes the efficiency loss and change of China’s indirect tax. The research shows that:(1) In general, considering production network structure, micro substitution elasticity coefficient and the model treatment of indirect tax, the efficiency loss rate of indirect tax in China is about 0.5%~10%.(2)The more complex the production network structure is, the greater the micro substitution elasticity coefficient is, and the greater the efficiency loss rate of indirect tax is.(3) The indirect tax efficiency loss rate calculated by the new second-order approximation method of production network is much greater than that of the classical harberger method.(4) From 1992 to 2017, China’s indirect tax efficiency loss rate showed phased characteristics. From 1992 to 2007, with the completion of tax sharing reform and deep integration into the global value chain after China’s entry into WTO, China’s indirect tax efficiency loss rate showed a downward trend on the whole. From 2007 to 2017, China’s indirect tax efficiency loss rate first increased under the influence of the financial crisis, and then remained stable or slightly decreased under the influence of policies such as tax reduction and fee reduction.
作者 倪红福 Ni Hongfu(University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Institute of Economics of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期36-55,共20页 Journal of Management World
基金 国家自然科学基金专项项目“中国贸易投资开放发展:基本规律、宏观效应与‘双循环’新发展格局构建”(基金号:72141309)、国家自然科学基金青年项目“垄断势力的福利损失及产业政策优化研究:基于生产网络结构一般均衡模型方法”(基金号:72103013)、国家自然科学基金面上项目“突发性公共卫生事件的全球价值链重构效应:基于生产网络结构一般均衡模型方法”(基金号:72073142)、国家自然科学基金面上项目“中国产业迈向价值链中高端:理论内涵、测度和路径分析”(基金号:71873142) 国家社会科学基金重大项目“实质性减税降费与经济高质量发展研究”(基金号:19ZDA069)的资助。
关键词 生产网络结构 投入产出 税制结构 效率损失 production network structure input-output tax structure efficiency loss
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献186

共引文献1401

引证文献11

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部