期刊文献+

大数据证据研析 被引量:6

Research and Analysis of Big Data Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法活动正迈向数据化,传统的证据和证明活动已难以满足现实需要,利用大数据技术得到的大数据证据成为破解困境的关键。从犯罪的新变化、证明难度以及印证证明上看,大数据证据有着独特价值,其所具有的双重相关性有利于实现从“因果关系”到“相关关系”的跨越。鉴于我国要求证据形式法定,在审查判断规则的适用中将大数据证据归入鉴定意见为宜。大数据证据可信性规则的建构,应从两方面展开,即基础数据的宏观整体真实规则和技术方法的有效质证规则以及最佳技术方法。 Judicial activities are moving towards digitization,a nd the traditional evidence and proof activities have been difficult to meet the practical needs.The big data evidence obtained by using big data technology has become the key to solve the dilemma.From the perspective of new changes in crime,difficulty of proof and confirmation,big data evidence has unique value,and its dual relevance is conducive to the leap from “causality” to “correlation”.In view of the statutory form of evidence required in China,it is appropriate to classify big data evidence into expert opinions in the application of review and judgment rules.The construction of big data evidence credibility rules should be carried out from two aspects,namely,the macro overall truth rules of basic data,the effective cross examination rules of technical methods and the best technical methods.
作者 洪涛 Hong Tao
机构地区 辽宁大学法学院
出处 《行政与法》 2022年第3期81-90,共10页 Administration and Law
关键词 价值增值 相关关系 有效质证 证据形式 value increment correlation effective cross examination form of evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献89

共引文献870

同被引文献121

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部