摘要
目的比较PDCA循环教学法与传统教学法在中医学教学中的差异。方法选取2018年1月-2019年8月在河西学院临床医学院学习中医学课程的100名学生作为研究对象,将其随机分为实验组和对照组,分别为52人和48人,实验组采用PDCA循环教学法,对照组采用传统教学法。观察时间为1个学期,期末考试结束后,比较2组学生的理论成绩,实训操作成绩和教学满意度。结果实验组学生的理论成绩、操作成绩及教学满意度均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在中医学教学中应用PDCA循环教学方法,能够调动学生们的学习积极性,提高学生的成绩及教学的满意度,具有推广价值。
Objective To compare the differences between PDCA cycle teaching method and traditional teaching method in traditional Chinese medicine teaching.Methods 100 students of traditional Chinese medicine in School of Clinical Medicine,Hexi University from January 2018 to August 2019 were selected as the research objects and randomly divided into experimental group and control group,with 52 students and 48 students respectively.The experimental group adopted PDCA cycle teaching method,while the control group adopted traditional teaching method.The observation time was one semester.After the final examination,the theoretical score,practical operation score and teaching satisfaction of the two groups were counted.Results The theoretical score,operation score and teaching satisfaction of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of PDCA cycle teaching method in traditional Chinese medicine teaching can mobilize students’learning enthusiasm,improve students’performance and teaching satisfaction,which has promotion value.
作者
李巧林
牛彦红
申睿
LI Qiaolin;NIU Yanhong;SHEN Rui(Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine,School of Clinical Medicine,Hexi University,Gansu Province,Zhangye 734000,China)
出处
《中国中医药现代远程教育》
2022年第13期20-21,共2页
Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
关键词
PDCA循环
传统教学方法
中医学
教学改革
PDCA cycle
traditional teaching methods
traditional Chinese medicine
teaching reform