摘要
【目的/意义】量化分析“五计学”的学科交叉研究,揭示“五计学”的学科来源与知识结构,掌握跨学科模式及规律,有助于推动开放科学背景下“五计学”研究的创新和发展。【方法/过程】采用核心主题词检索策略,基于文献计量的视角,研究“五计学”知识产出的跨学科广度、知识流动的跨学科广度和演化特征。【结果/结论】(1)“五计学”知识产出呈现稳定增长,知识产出和知识流动多元学科特征明显;(2)“五计学”分学科知识产出对不同学科知识的吸收能力有较大差距,不同学科“五计学”知识扩散效应不同。(3)“五计学”研究知识流入时滞多集中在2年,但不同学科“五计学”知识流出时滞差距较大。(4)图书情报与数字图书馆是“五计学”的主研究学科,但核心地位正在弱化,科学研究管理的“五计学”知识产出整体质量最高。【创新/局限】揭示了“五计学”研究的跨学科广度特征。未来增加图书、会议论文、学位论文等载体进行跨学科深入研究。
【Purpose/significance】The quantitative analysis of the interdisciplinary research of"Five-Metrics"reveals its disciplinary sources and knowledge structure,grasps the interdisciplinary patterns and laws,and helps to promote the innovation and development of"Five-Metrics"research in the context of Open Science.【Method/process】The cross-disciplinary breadth of knowledge output,cross-disciplinary breadth of knowledge flow,and evolutionary characteristics of"Five-Metrics"are studied based on a bibliometric perspective of using a core subject term search strategy.【Result/conclusion】(1)The knowledge output of"Five-Metrics"shows a steady growth,and the multi-disciplinary characteristics of knowledge output and knowledge flow are obvious.(2)There is a large gap in the absorption capacity of"Five-Metrics"sub-disciplinary knowledge output to different disciplines,and the diffusion effect of"Five-Metrics"knowledge differs among different disciplines.(3)The time lag for the inflow of knowledge in"Five-Metrics"research is mostly concentrated in 2 years,but the time lag for the outflow of"Five-Metrics"knowledge varies widely among different disciplines.(4)Library,Information and Digital Libraries is the main research discipline of"Five-Metrics",but the core position is weakening,and the overall quality of the knowledge output of"Five-Metrics"is highest in scientific research management.【Innovation/limitation】It reveals the interdisciplinary breadth of the research on"Five-Metrics".In the future,books,conference papers,dissertations,and other vehicles will be added for in-depth interdisciplinary research.
作者
赵鸿玉
王旭
ZHAO Hong-yu;WANG Xu(Library of Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China;School of Economics Management of Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao 066004,China;Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China,Beijing 100038,China)
出处
《情报科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期107-117,共11页
Information Science
基金
河北省社会科学基金项目“开放科学背景下中国学术期刊话语权评价研究”(HB21TQ001)。