摘要
我国进入高质量发展阶段,需要转变发展方式。高质量发展是对经济社会发展方方面面的总要求,乡村振兴中农村社区协商系统也需要转向高质量发展。国际上已开始关注协商资本与协商质量的单体研究,但忽视了其也可以形成关联耦合,在一个完备的协商系统中,拓展协商资本会影响协商质量。通过对干部、专家和媒体三类行为主体介入全国首批5个农村社区治理实验区的协商实验案例进行考察发现,在协商系统中,三个行动变量释放的协商资本能够显著提升协商质量。其中,专家的积极影响最大,干部的消极影响有限,媒体的监督效应明显。为此提出乡村振兴中社区协商系统高质量发展路径,即通过增加协商资本来发展协商质量,协商系统的高质量发展需要注重转向协商资本的培育。具体来讲,新时代社区协商的高质量发展由环环相扣的三部分构成,农村社区协商高质量发展需要立足本土的协商系统建构,协商系统高质量发展要关注协商能力提高这个基础,协商资本的有效培育是社区协商系统高质量发展的关键;同时,各地在实践操作中还要善于开展试点实验。
China has come to the stage of high-quality development and needs changing its development mode.High quality is all that is called for in both economic and social development.In rural revitalization,the deliberation system of rural community also needs a high-quality mode of development.The focus of international researchers has been put on separate conception of deliberation capital or deliberation quality,but not on the internal relationship in between.In a complete deliberation system,expanding deliberation capital affects the deliberation quality.This paper studies five cases with intervention variables of three kinds:those of officials,experts and media in rural community deliberation experiment in the first batch of five rural community governance experimental areas in China.The results show that in the deliberation system,the deliberation capital released by the three action variables can significantly improve the deliberation quality.Among them,the positive influence of experts is the most significant;the negative influence of officials is limited;and the supervision effect of the media is obvious.Therefore,it puts forward the high-quality development mode for community deliberation system in rural revitalization,that is to increase deliberation capital to develop deliberation quality,and in high-quality development of deliberation system,focus should be put on cultivating deliberation capital.More exactly,this mode consists of three interrelated parts:first,high-quality development of rural community deliberation is to take the construction of local deliberation system as its base;second,it should be focused on improving deliberation ability;and,third,it is the key to the high-quality development of community deliberation system to effectively cultivate deliberation capital.At the same time,pretests should be made before any further moves should be made.
出处
《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期67-81,162,163,共17页
Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(20BZZ020)。