语文课堂中的认知损耗及其应对被引量：1

Cognitive Loss in Chinese Classroom and Its Countermeasures

下载PDF

导出

摘要认知损耗是认知活动消耗认知能量而引起认知功能下降的过程,这是语文课堂教学效率低下的重要原因之一。在语文课堂中,认知损耗是广泛存在的。认知损耗的诱发原因和生理机制比较复杂,其具体类型可分多种。从共时性维度来看,认知损耗的本质是学生群体或师生共同注意力的分散,减损了专心投入的程度,最终造成教学、学习等效率的下降。从历时性维度看,语文课堂中的认知损耗指前一件事直接分散了后一件事中当事人的注意,降低了后一件事的完成效率。只有树立正确的态度和认识,采取有效的策略,才能减少语文课堂中的认知损耗现象。 Cognitive loss is the process that cognitive activities consume cognitive energy and cause the decline of cognitive function,which is one of the important reasons for the low efficiency of Chinese classroom teaching.In Chinese classroom,cognitive loss is widespread.The inducing causes and physiological mechanism of cognitive loss are complex,and its specific types can be divided into many kinds.From the synchronic dimension,the essence of cognitive loss is the distraction of the common attention of students or teachers and students,which reduces the degree of concentration,and finally leads to the decline of the efficiency of teaching and learning.From the diachronic dimension,cognitive loss in Chinese classroom refers to that the former event directly distracts the attention of the parties in the latter event and reduces the completion efficiency of the latter event.Only by establishing a correct attitude and understanding and adopting effective strategies can we reduce the cognitive loss in Chinese classroom.

作者熊纪涛 Xiong Jitao(Middle School Affiliated to Hainan Institute of Tropical Oceanography,Wuzhishan 572200,China)

机构地区海南热带海洋学院附属中学

出处《齐鲁师范学院学报》 2022年第3期78-84,共7页 Journal of Qilu Normal University

基金海南省教育科学规划2021年度立项课题“基于专业方法落实语文核心素养的名师课例研究”(课题编号:QJH202110105)的阶段性研究成果。

关键词认知损耗语文课堂注意教学效率 Cognitive loss Chinese classroom Attention Teaching efficiency

分类号 G63 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1谭树华,许燕,王芳,宋婧.自我损耗:理论、影响因素及研究走向[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(5):715-725. 被引量：107

二级参考文献67

1Alberts, H. J. E. M., Martijn, C., & de Vries, N. K. (2011).Fighting self-control failure: Overcoming ego depletion by increasing self-awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 58-62.
2Alberts, H. J. E. M., Martijn, C., Greb, J., Merckelbach, H., & de Vries, N. K. (2007). Carrying on or giving in: The role of automatic processes in overcoming ego depletion. British Journal ~?f Social Psychology, 46, 383-399.
3Balliet, D., & Joireman, J. (2010). Ego depletion reduces proselfs' concern with the well-being of others. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 227-239.
4Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Ego depletion and the self's executive function. In A. Tesser & R. B. Felson (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 9-33). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
5Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Ego depletion, the executive function, and self-control: An energy model of the self in personality. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace, Decade of behavior (pp. 299-316). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
6Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Ego depletion and self-control failure: An energy model of the sells executive function. Self and Identity, 1, 129-136.
7Baumeister, R. F., Bauer, I. M., & Lloyd, S. A. (2010). Choice, free will, and religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 67-82.
8Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
9Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition, 18, 130-150.
10Cyders, M. A., & Smith, G. T. (2007). Mood-based rash action and its components: Positive and negative urgency. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 839-850.