我国知识产权指导性案例司法适用的现实考察与完善进路

The Practical Investigation and Improvement of the Judicial Application of Guiding Cases of Intellectual Property Rights in China

知识产权指导性案例自发布以来备受关注,但囿于知识产权客体的非物质性、技术创新与制度间的非协同性、司法政策指导作用的介入因素及知识产权指导性案例自身的缺陷,导致知识产权指导性案例在现实应用中存在援引频次低、涵摄范围窄、案件储备少等问题。知识产权指导性案例对于弥补法律规范的滞后性、统一司法共识和法律适用具有重要意义。针对知识产权指导性案例在适用过程中存在的问题,最高人民法院发布知识产权指导性案例时,应当进一步提高撰写、概括裁判要点的专业能力,逐步扩大指导性案例的涵摄范围,统一法律规范与裁判要点,协调司法政策与指导性案例之间的关系,以此提高知识产权指导性案例的司法援引率,充分发挥知识产权指导性案例的制度价值和指导功能。

Intellectual property guiding cases have attracted much attention since their publication.But due to the object of intellectual property rights of non-material,the collaborative between technology innovation and institution,the judicial policy guidance intervention factors and intellectual property rights guide case itself defects,lead to the problems of low citation frequency,narrow scope of correspondence,and less case reserve in the practical application of intellectual property guiding cases.The guiding cases of intellectual property are of great significance to remedy the lag of legal norms and unify judicial consensus and law application.In view of the intellectual property rights in applied problems existing in the process of guiding cases,when the Supreme People's Court issues a guiding case for intellectual property,intellectual property shall further improve writing,summarizing the referee points of professional ability,gradually expanding the scope of the letter of guiding cases shoot,unified the referee points and legal norms,to coordinate the relationship between the instructional cases and judicial policy,in order to improve the judicial citing rate of intellectual property guiding cases,give full play to the institutional value and function of intellectual property guiding cases.