党内分歧视角下中共武装整编研究——以1929年红四军第四纵队整编为中心

Research on the Armed Reorganization of the CPC From the Perspective of Inner-party Differences——Centered on the Reorganization of the Fourth Column of the Fourth Red Army in 1929

革命进程中武装整编引发的党内分歧颇为普遍。1929年6月,毛泽东、朱德在闽西推行的红四纵队整编引发了闽西地方精英傅柏翠与红四军及中共闽西特委书记邓子恢等人的争论,双方在红四纵队建制统属、教导连保留还是混编以及肉刑制度的去留问题上产生严重分歧。傅柏翠所坚持的红四纵队编入红四军系统以及保留教导连的主张均被否定,其所主张的废止肉刑虽被认可,但亦未能得到妥善的解决,三者的叠加最终导致傅柏翠的辞职。武装整编过程中的各类关系对此次党内分歧的产生、演进与结果产生了重要的影响。

The inner-party differences arising from the armed reorganization in the revolutionary process were quite common.In June 1929,Mao Zedong and Zhu De promoted the reorganization of the fourth column of the Fourth Red Army in western Fujian,which triggered a debate between Fu Baicui,a local elite in western Fujian,the Fourth Red Army and Deng Zihui,the secretary of the Special Committee of Western Fujian,etc.The two sides had serious differences on the ownership of the fourth column,whether to retain the teaching company or to regroup it with others,and whether the corporal punishment system retained.Fu Baicui's insistence on the incorporation of the fourth column into the Fourth Red Army system and the retention of the teaching company were denied.Although his proposal to abolish corporal punishment was recognized,it could not be properly solved.The superposition of the three things eventually led to Fu Baicui's resignation.Kinds of relations in the process of armed reorganization had an important influence on the generation,evolution and result of those inner-party differences.