期刊文献+

推理主义:逻辑与意义理论 被引量:1

Inferentialism:Logic and Theory of Meaning
原文传递
导出
摘要 很多人习惯于自下而上从词项之意义出发去理解语句进而把握推理,推理主义者则倒过来由推理去解释语句和词项,认为语言表达式的意义决定于它们在人类推理中所扮演的角色,因而我们在理解他人主张或掌握某些概念时应重点关注它们如何充当某一类推理的前提和结论(或是其中的一部分)。当这种革新观念的理论效应正在当代认识论、语言哲学等领域持续发酵和释放时,不应忘记它的逻辑学根底和渊源。然而,推理主义并非简单地抬高现代逻辑的价值,毋宁说,它让我们有机会重新理解逻辑学的本性及地位,尤其是逻辑与当代哲学的内在相关性。哲学家们在把肇始于逻辑学领域的推理主义路径发展成为全域性的语义推理主义的同时,也在整理和重塑现代逻辑的基本观念,从而使得我们对“何谓逻辑”“逻辑的认识论”“逻辑与理性的关系”等根本性逻辑哲学问题的回答,呈现出新的面向和复杂性。作为逻辑与哲学深层互动的最好例证之一,推理主义的诞生及其在当前哲学界的影响力表明,逻辑学并未失去它曾在20世纪哲学研究中所享有的“引擎”地位。 Whereas one tends to understand sentences and inferences by words and their combinations in a bottom-up approach,inferentialists from the top down explain the meaning of sentences and words in terms of some rules of inference,especially their roles as premises or conclusion(or parts of premise or conclusion)of correct inferences.As the theoretical applications of inferentialism in contemporary epistemology and philosophy of language are increasing and multiplying,it should not be forgotten that its main ideas come originally form logic.However,it can’t be suggested that inferentialism has promoted greatly the status of modern logic in philosophy.The point is that it gives us a chance to review the nature of modern logic and the relevance of logic to contemporary philosophy from a brand-new perspective.Semantic inferentialism as a global inferentialism,not only stretches beyond the reach of logical inferentialism,but also clarifies and rebuilds our conception of logic,thereby calling for a different solution to fundamental problems such as“what is logic?”“the epistemology of logic”,and“the relation of logicality and rationality”.All these disputes motivated by inferentialism attest to the role of logic as an engine of philosophical investigations in the 21th century.
作者 张留华 ZHANG Liuhua
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第5期28-38,共11页 Academic Monthly
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“逻辑词汇的历史演进与哲学问题研究”(项目号20&ZD046)的阶段性成果。
关键词 逻辑常项 推理主义 推理规则 意义 logical constants inferentialism rules of inference meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1Rudolf Carnap, "The Old and the New Logic," in Logical Positivism, ed. A.J. Ayer, The Free Press, 1959, p.133, p.145.
  • 2Jennifer Fisher, On the Philosophy of Logic, Chapter 13, Wadsworth, 2008, pp. 176-189.
  • 3Rudolf Carnap, Logical Syntax of Language,Routledge, 1937, p. 52.
  • 4C.S.Peirce, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., Harvard University Press, 1934, para.108.
  • 5C.S.Peiree, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol.3, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., Harvard University Press, 1933, para.404.
  • 6C.S.Peirce, The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2 (1893-1913) edited by Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, 1998, p.327.
  • 7Gilbert Harman, "Internal Critique: A Logic is not a Theory of Reasoning and a Theory of Reasoning is not a Logic," in D.M. Gabbay, R.H. Johnson, H.J. Ohlbach, and J. Woods, eds., Handbook of the Logic of Argument and lnference: The Turn Towards the Practical, Volume 1 in Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 2002, p. 171.
  • 8Gilbert Harman, Change in View: Principles of Reasoning, The MIT Press, 1986, p.11.
  • 9Gilbert Harman, "Internal Critique: A Logic is not a Theory of Reasoning and a Theory of Reasoning is not a Logic,'in D.M. Gabbay, R.H. Johnson, H.J. Ohlbach, and J. Woods, eds., Handbook of the Logic of Argument and lnference: The Turn Towards the Practical, Volume 1 in Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 2002, pp. 174-175.
  • 10Stephen Read, Thinking About Logic." An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp.67-74.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部